uadinataliousionderigesy

uadinataliousionderigesy wrote (edited )

lmao i'm "ableist", "trolling", and "reactionary" because i want us to be free of capitalism and autocracy sometime in the next million years. you folks are such fucking shit people that you can't engage with even a baseline of honesty. anarchists are the owner class' best friends, and stalinists are historically illiterate dickheads who've done more damage to the working class than most movements in history :)

−6

uadinataliousionderigesy OP wrote

lol it has nothing to do with ableism shithead. you're painfully ignorant and your thinking is clouded and irrational. that's got nothing to do with anything congenital, intrinsic or inflicted, it's just a description of what the problem is. your thinking is currently shit and that makes you make the world a worse place. it doesn't have to be. people with mental disabilities can easily be in a state of much clearer, much more moral, and much more beneficial thought that you are now. you're using idpol in the most disingenuous and cynical possible way, and for that you really are scum

−4

uadinataliousionderigesy OP wrote

"centrist liberal" hahahhahaha i'm a revolutionary marxist you extremely online motherfucker. here's the solution: prepare for revolutionary conditions by recruiting people to become committed revolutionary socialists, agitate in unions and workplaces, organise strikes and protests as much as possible, and train everyone in making strong arguments and leadership so that when an opportunity presents itself, as is happening right now in Algeria and Sudan, you can defeat counterrevolutionary reformism or rightwing backlash by organising the working class as a cohesive and ideologically motivated whole, which can strike with the full weight of the working class simultaneously. this is the central feature lacking in Iran '79, Chile '72-73, France '68, Egypt/Tunisia/Libya 2011, and countless other revolutionary moments. when the revolutionary movement allows itself to be streamed through bourgeois electoralism, or to be gradually worn down in small skirmishes against an organised right-wing, it fails.

burning cop cars is fantastic. so is killing cops or drowning landlords. but isolated/guerilla/direct action that doesn't have the sustainable support of the working class is going to lead to mass disillusionment and burnout. those things are very good to employ at critical moments but they're extremely taxing on the resources of any left movement. similarly, if you only pursue strikes without growing a solid core of committed organisers, repeated failure against a vastly more powerful state and regressive society will also just hurt more than it helps. you have to be in this to win – resolutely and finally. we only need one sufficiently strong socialist revolution to end capitalism forever. this needs patience and extremely, extremely, hard work. in places with extraordinarily low levels of worker's power such as australia, this means that you need to recruit people with lots of spare time and safety from bourgeois reprisal. unfortunately this excludes most working-class people and leaves mostly students, academics, bourgeois heir class traitors, the unemployed. if you have a more advanced social situation, then you can move to recruit union delegates and other committed socialist working class people. this is when you start to get real social power amongst the working class. when a crisis happens and people flock to socialist ideas - as always happens - having deep links and contacts throughout all industries and unions means that you can start to immediately develop and connect worker's councils, revolutionary unions etc. coordinating millions of people is a task that requires massive amounts of preparation. whenever workers are exposed to serious class struggle, they are empowered and awakened in a way that's completely impossible in the confines of normal capitalist life. socialists need to be there when that happens, and they need to have strong arguments and ideas. anarchists' garbled ideology make this absolutely vital organisation impossible, and stalinists are basically just right-wingers with extra steps. stalinists have ratfucked almost every revolutionary opportunity in the past 100 years.

also i'm australian and would gladly choke Mueller to death with my bare hands. i don't even know what dailykos is exactly.

−6

uadinataliousionderigesy wrote

Reply to comment by !deleted1196 in by !deleted17644

fr if you could log off, meditate for a sec on the inherent logical and moral failures of anarchism, and maybe talk to a revolutionary marxist in person without behaving like the shithead you are online, that would be fantastic and you might actually contribute something to the downfall of capitalism

−7

uadinataliousionderigesy wrote

Reply to comment by !deleted17611 in by !deleted17644

these videos confirmed my understanding of what "anarchism" is taken to mean by most people, and my criticism remains. to demand a direct democracy that is capable of locally overriding the will of a larger number of people than you is tyranny; it's asserting your (or your subgroup's) rights over the MoP and society above other people's. it's intrinsically immoral in the exact same way libertarianism is. you can't clasp your hands over your ears and pretend the rest of the world's people don't exist and don't have equal right to freedoms and resources as you do, just because they exist far away from you or because you don't frequent their circles.

−7

uadinataliousionderigesy wrote

Reply to comment by !deleted1196 in by !deleted17644

how the fuck is that ableism hhahahahahhahahahh

this is a microcosm of exactly the problem with anarchists - a power structure very much exists in real material terms, but you deny and obscure it, and so there's real analysis or care taken to make sure that the power structure isn't wielded badly or tyrannically. "mod authority will be used only when other options are exhausted", yet in reality, the moderation is stricter and more fickle than otherwise. read some fucking theory or talk to someone that's achieved any socialist outcome in their life, jesus

−6

uadinataliousionderigesy wrote

Reply to comment by !deleted1196 in by !deleted17644

oh yeah man definitely, absolutely. everyone who's read more than you and works harder than you and goes out in public and talks to strangers about socialism more than you is a bootlicker. someone who regularly tells cops in person that they're class traitors is a bootlicker. god you're pathetic.

−7

uadinataliousionderigesy wrote

Reply to comment by !deleted1196 in by !deleted17644

this is an unbelievably bad take lol. just catastrophically ignorant and confused. there is no meaningful democracy under capitalism. ugh it gives me the heebie-jeebies how fucking bad this article is. well, this community's definitely going to be completely fucking useless for bringing socialism to the world if this is the kind of thing that gets upvoted

−7

uadinataliousionderigesy wrote

Reply to comment by Basil in by !deleted17644

/r/cth is flooded with anarchists and tankies; what are you talking about? There's basically no revolutionary Marxists or trots there at all. it's literally just anarchists, tankies, and demsocs (plus a million libs ofc)

−3