tamarack

tamarack wrote (edited )

The same UN Human Rights Council which allowed Saudi fucking Arabia to become a member? That one?

A grotesque mockery of a nation withdraws from a grotesque mockery of international cooperation. Big whoop.

Maybe if Vermont becomes an independent country again, we can chair a new Human Rights Council, one with teeth; one that says to Saudi Arabia, "GTFO, you folk oppress women and have sex with goats" and says to the rest of America, "GTFO, you folk have lost your fucking minds".

1

tamarack wrote (edited )

elections

Putting faith in elections is idiotic at best. If the 2020 election were to happen in the midst of a "recession", it's equally likely as a true-left wave that an even worse totalitarian government would be the result. People think Trump is the end of the fucking world, just like they thought George II was the end of the fucking world fifteen years ago. It can very easily get worse. President Mike Pence would be worse, and that is a distinct possibility in 2020.

When used by the lying enemy collaborator media, the word "recession" simply means that the enemy 1% suffer along with the rest of us. During a "recession", in their anger and fear, the enemy may well pull out all the stops and drop all pretense of America being a democratic society.

Elections are not going to save us. Enemy heads on spikes might; and that should be the response, not fucking participation in the enemy's rituals--which, by the way, usually have predetermined outcomes.

2

tamarack wrote (edited )

Reply to comment by suterussu in Praxis Question by Green_Mountain_Makhno

This. If a community chooses to entrust a person with leadership, the person so chosen has a responsibility to carry out the will of the community--quite literally, to execute it, to bring it into being. Indeed, this is from whence cometh the term "executive".

OP has a duty to the community which has bestowed its trust, not to us.

That being said, I think it would be a good idea, generally speaking, to pursue ideas which promote both self-governance of the community and mutual aid within it.

4

tamarack wrote (edited )

You figure out if there's a socialist secession movement in the region of the enemy country where you live, you join it, and you fight for your country's liberation from the enemy by any means necessary.

Example: the California secession movement ought rightly to be hijacked by real socialists / anarchists. It's currently run by enemy collaborators who don't really want to see it succeed.

Another example: I'm a card-carrying member of the Atlantic National Party. Our #1 policy platform plank is this: "The six New England states, along with the counties of New York not named New York, Bronx, Kings, Queens, Richmond, Suffolk, Nassau, Rockland or Westchester, must reclaim our own place within the community of nations, and we suggest that this new nation be called the Atlantic Republic."

Plank #2: "The United States of America is ruled by a criminal regime which is the enemy of our People and which makes war upon our People every day. This war must be stopped by any means necessary."

Plank #3: "We do not negotiate with terrorists. Anything less than an unconditional cession of our territory by the enemy country is unacceptable."

The rest of the planks, in the aggregate, enumerate an absolute, Nature-given right of people to live their lives as they see fit, provided they do not harm others and provided they recognize the common duties of mutual aid and protection we all owe to our neighbors.

2

tamarack wrote (edited )

Wait, you can sell clothing to second-hand stores?

I was under the impression that they took donations, then sold said donations, paid upkeep and payroll, and did charity with the rest. (Except the Salvation Army, they waste the surplus on Jesusfreakism. Fuck the Salvation Army with a rusty screwdriver.) That's the business model of all the thrift stores where I live.

2

tamarack wrote

If I have spare change on me, sure. It's a nice thing to do.

One time there was a guy panhandling outside the supermarket who asked if I could spare some change. I didn't have cash on me at the time, so I said, "sorry, haven't got any, I wasn't paying with cash". As I was walking to the beer cooler though, I realized I did have one coin in my pocket -- a penny I'd found on the street earlier, which I consider good luck.

So as I'm leaving, I went up to the guy and told him the story, that I still didn't have change, but I had found a lucky penny earlier, I figured he needed it more than I did, and that I hoped it would being him good juju. He replied, "Most people don't give a brother like me that kind of thought. Thanks. Really, thanks."

I saw him a week or so later and asked him if he still has the penny. He gets a big smile on his face, pulls it out of his pocket, and says, "Yup." I ask, "Is it working?" He says, "Well, not as well as I'd like--I'm still here, right?--but yeah, I think it is." I had some cash on me at that point, so I gave him five bucks.

Haven't seen the dude since. I wonder if the penny kicked into high gear.

2

tamarack wrote

How about no.

At most, Bernie should be President of a newly-formed confederation of the six New England states plus the parts of New York that aren't NYC, Long Island, or Westchester and Rockland Counties. The enemy country is an imperial abomination that should be torn apart post-haste.

I would even go so far as to say that Bernie doesn't deserve to be the President in the North. He bent the knee. Real Northerners don't do that.

1

tamarack wrote

Reply to comment by boringskip in by !deleted6930

Big ups to my man Lucien Greaves. I really hope y'all's 12' tall Baphomet statue finds a home soon, so I can visit it.

2

tamarack wrote

What exactly are you high on? I would like to sample some of it.

Although, since you're apparently serious in a desire to literally get rid of one of the dimensions of the Universe, I suppose you'd probably also be okay with getting rid of "up", which would preclude the possibility of getting "high", and now I've gone cross-eyed

3

tamarack wrote

At the world? At Our Mother, who nourishes and sustains all life? Her morals are beyond human comprehension, so it would be absurd for me to harbor anger toward Her. I can feel hurt and sad when She chooses to make me suffer in spite of my trying to be a good person, but anger? Not only is that absurd, it would be pointless anyway, since there's no productive way to make use of it. I suppose there's no point in feeling hurt or sad either, since I cannot possibly know why Our Mother does the things She does or how to convince Her to stop, so the least possible evil is simply to bear it the best I can. The First Noble Truth is "Suffering is inherent to existence." Best to get over it.

Now, if by "the world" you mean the masters, who fancy themselves superior to Our Mother and who do indeed exist as living gods among us, then you're goddamn right I'm angry. As someone else put it so eloquently, mine is an icy hatred. The most productive way to manage that emotion is to make one's whole life an act of resistance against the masters.

1

tamarack wrote

Bernie Sanders has firsthand knowledge of how the Democratic Party robbed him of the nomination and handed the election to the Orange One on a silver platter; but he refuses to call them out and expose their crimes for all to see.

As far as I'm concerned, he has become a willing collaborator with the demon elite and no longer deserves our support.

1

tamarack wrote (edited )

Not to be a downer, but the case is going to go nowhere.

The enemy country has given itself and its minions something called "sovereign immunity". SI means you cannot sue the enemy country in its own courts unless the enemy country has previously consented to being sued. It has done so only in a ridiculously small minority of situations.

Likewise, a person cannot sue one of the enemy country's minions unless the enemy country has consented to its minions being sued; again, this has been fine only in a tiny fraction of situations.

I reckon the dude's lawsuit will be for "deprivation of civil rights under color of law". Those cases are virtually impossible to win--I think the enemy's loss rate is less than ten percent--and it's not like the slave media are going to give the guy a platform to get his message out.

A better solution would be to kidnap the DA, deliver him to a mob, let the mob have their way with him, and then display what's left of him as a warning to others.

1

tamarack wrote

To paraphrase the proposed Constitution of the Atlantic Republic (publication forthcoming, along with a book outlining the policies and theories of Northern secession, later this year):

"Everyone has the right to keep and bear arms for self-defense, for the defense of family and property, for the defense of the community, and for the taking of game; and while this right shall not be abridged, so too shall anyone asserting it be responsible for its abuse."

Put another way, punching up (i.e., committing violence against those higher than you on the power ladder) is always justified. Punching down (i.e., using a superior position on the power ladder to inflict violence) is never justified.

1

tamarack wrote

I admit I got a chuckle out of "choose your own adventure" as a rhetorical device. That's pretty good, I'll have to try it sometime.

As for actual results, yeah, you're probably right, one person with a .30-06 probably isn't going to take out six or eight Fedcoats. But realistically there are other ways of killing Fedcoats that don't involve shooting them. I would have to know the layout of the farm to figure out what could be done, but anyone worth their salt should already have done that homework. It's sad that we have to be constantly on guard against State terrorism, but until the enemy country is smashed into dust, you'd do well to consider the tactical elements of defending your property. Where are the sight lines? Can the enemy be corralled into a small space? Where are the best defensive positions?

You do that research and you've got a leg up on 99% of people. I guarantee you that guy who lives in a subdivision and fancies himself a survivalist because he owns 3 AR-15s hasn't given the first thought to actual tactics.

1

tamarack wrote

Reply to comment by Emery in Ancap daycare by bel793

Очень хорошо! На следующей неделе мы начнем работать над более полезными фразами.

2

tamarack wrote

Reply to comment by 365degrees in Ancap daycare by bel793

Привет товарищи, Я слышал, что вы любите ГУЛАГ, поэтому я поставил ГУЛАГ в ваш ГУЛАГ, чтобы вы могли стать политическим заключенным, пока вы политический заключенный.

3