squirrels
squirrels wrote
Consistently debunked psuedoscience. It's like saying that climate change deniers are climatologists, or that a flat earther is a geologist. They use "social science" to give their ideology legitimacy, when it has no basis in the data. Augustin Fuentes, an actual social scientist, gave an excellent rebuttal to a racist like Charles Murray after his lecture at Notre Dame: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVDeBL6FuP0&t=53m23s
squirrels wrote
I take it as more evidence that Gould was on the right track with punctuated equilibrium.
squirrels wrote
I have to say that if they really do explore alternate universes with this, then I take back every criticism I've ever made of the show. It would be so intensely brilliant, and that twist ending made me very excited. Alternate universes would make every weird inconsistency make sense. It had to be hard to wade through all of the backlash with all of the changes only to keep thinking "damn it, people. Bear with us. There's a payoff involved here!"
Also, <3 Stamets.
squirrels wrote
Some articles are gold, but much of Autostraddle reads like just a white lesbian social circle. Those editors can get hyper-defensive and delete a lot of opinions that don't agree with them.
squirrels wrote
Gould wrote about Kropotkin?! I know that might not matter to most, but since Gould was a massive influence on me... thank you. I am going to read this and hold it close to my heart.
squirrels wrote
Reply to I don't know who/what I am... by elyersio
That's ok! You're ok just as you are. :)
squirrels wrote
It's either: slutty, just a phase, or you're a predator. I've gotten them all at one time or another.
squirrels wrote
Reply to comment by ziq in People Are Furious After Lena Dunham Defended a “Girls” Writer Accused of Sexual Assault by An_Old_Big_Tree
White feminism at its worst.
squirrels wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted1759 in People Are Furious After Lena Dunham Defended a “Girls” Writer Accused of Sexual Assault by An_Old_Big_Tree
Wow. What human garbage. Denying the agency of sex workers and the policies and advice of actual humanitarian workers.
"Intelligent feminists" What classist bullshit.
squirrels wrote (edited )
Reply to People Are Furious After Lena Dunham Defended a “Girls” Writer Accused of Sexual Assault by An_Old_Big_Tree
She is an exemplary case of why those who commodify and sell "feminism" aren't allies.
On that note: I have immense personal hatred for Girls, as someone who abused me used it as a justification for hurting me. He used it to say that young women were vapid and deserved abuse, because they could easily get out of abusive relationships but don't. He was a huge fan of the show. It perpetuates stereotypes, racism, and sexism and displays a gross amount of classist themes.
squirrels wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted1759 in by !deleted1759
I personally think that the problem is if it's applied within the state and people call upon the power of the state to enforce consent as a felt sense. I am wary of applying this in the context of the state, as such ambiguous policing of sex has more often than not been used to punish queer or otherwise marginalized people.
Having said that, I will say that this concept helped me heal a few years ago when I first ran across it. It was therapeutic and I think it could be a powerful tool toward dismantling patriarchal notions of sex. And, as you said, it's something to consider in non-legalistic models.
squirrels wrote
Reply to comment by DissidentRage in What are your politics? by LucyParsonsRocks
I was going to write something, but I couldn't put it better.
squirrels wrote
Reply to What are your favorite Pussy Riot songs? by elyersio
Chaika is probably my favorite. The music video is choice: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VakUHHUSdf8
squirrels wrote
Obligatory https://duckduckgo.com/
squirrels wrote
Reply to Ellen Page reveals she was outed and sexually harassed by a director in brutally honest post by Defasher
Exceptionally well written and clear about the power relations involved. She has my admiration for speaking out.
squirrels wrote
Is anyone else worried that because of this that the movement against sexual assault might be co-opted by anti-LGBT+ causes? I am thinking of cases like the San Antonio Four, and it worries me.
(Also, fuck Kevin Spacey)
squirrels wrote
Indeed they should be. This will single-handedly be the death blow of graduate education in the United States, which is already on life support. Universities would have to either eliminate graduate tuition (that'll happen when hell freezes over), only admit the independently wealthy, or only admit students from abroad. An insidiously ingenious way of dismantling graduate education.
squirrels wrote
Reply to Star Trek Discovery Episode 7: "Magic to Make The Sanest Man Go Mad" discussion [SPOILERS] by Durruti
By far the best so far. I hope they keep this up.
squirrels wrote
Reply to comment by ziq in Star Trek Discovery Episode 7: "Magic to Make The Sanest Man Go Mad" discussion [SPOILERS] by Durruti
That was something that got me hooked, actually. For once we got a "groundhog day" trope that wasn't from the perspective of the person aware of the loop. And even though Stamets wasn't the focus of the episode, it gave him some nice character development.
squirrels wrote
Reply to comment by ________deleted in Star Trek Discovery Episode 8: "Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum" discussion [SPOILERS] by Durruti
Episode 7 finally got me on bored. Fantastic story. Still iffy about the plot, but 7 made me go, "eh, I'm still watching and maybe they'll make more of this."
squirrels OP wrote
Reply to comment by goof_goat in The GOP tax bill could be a disaster for PhD students by squirrels
Yup.
squirrels wrote
Reply to So... We live in the mirror universe, right? by ziq
Yuuuuuuup.