snake
snake wrote
Reply to comment by existential1 in How to Make the Perfect Milkshake for Throwing at Fascists by An_Old_Big_Tree
Not gonna lie kinda creepy
snake wrote
This article is talking about Iraqi Kurdistan, which is definitely not Rojava, and is instead a neighboring corrupt tribal state. This also happened in Rojava, but that's not mentioned in this article.
snake wrote
Reply to comment by BrowseDuringClass1917 in r/socialism and r/latestagecapitalism mods speak out against tankie mods controlling all discourse, get banned for it by ziq
Those who don't shouldn't either, for it corrupts them.
snake wrote
Reply to What's your favorite animal? Why? by Basil
I'll let you make a guess.
snake wrote
Reply to comment by hasbrochem in by mile
Its a bot.
snake wrote
Reply to comment by zzuum in Is Ace exclusion against TOS? by mofongo
That's not the question; the question is whether they're queer. I don't think "pressure for not having children" is quite qualifying.
snake wrote
Reply to by !deleted13453
That's not unicode lookalike. I don't think that can reasonably be fixed.
snake wrote
What a fucking terrible industry to celebrate.
snake wrote
Reply to Tiananmen: The Massacre that Wasn't by Mao
the Washington Post described how anti-government fighters had been organized into formations of 100-150 people. They were armed with Molotov cocktails and iron clubs, to meet the PLA who were still unarmed in the days prior to June 4.
What happened in China, what took the lives of government opponents and of soldiers on June 4, was not a massacre of peaceful students but a battle between PLA soldiers and armed detachments from the so-called pro-democracy movement.
Are we meant to dislike armed detachments of students fighting a military? Not like these weren't socialist protestors anyway.
snake wrote
Reply to Are communist not permitted on raddle.me? by Mao
No. Only anarcho-capitalists are allowed on this web dot site.
snake wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted7213 in Chairman Mao Zedong Discord! Destroy imperialism with us by Mao
They must have complained during that very short time. Or I'm mixing them up with another indistinguishable angry tank.
snake wrote
Reply to comment by ziq in Chairman Mao Zedong Discord! Destroy imperialism with us by Mao
They complained about Raddle on FULLCOMMUNISM a few times.
snake wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted7213 in Is Ace exclusion against TOS? by mofongo
What? No. I'm not a fucking transphobe.
snake wrote
Reply to comment by Mao in Who was your idol growing up? Who (if anyone) is your idol now? by Basil
Sounds like a sad childhood...
snake wrote (edited )
No anime avatars (Sorry, but a very large amount of drama and bullshittery comes from folks with anime avatars)
That also disproportionately removes trans people, I imagine. Anime is a pretty large cultural staple of Online Trans Culture, for some reason (I don't watch much and don't get the appeal) so I don't think this is the best move.
snake wrote
Free Uyghuristan
snake wrote
Reply to comment by hermit_dragon in Is Ace exclusion against TOS? by mofongo
Trans people suffer from homophobia - that's a component of transphobia. The perception of trans people as just gay individuals of their assigned gender, and thus treatment as such.
snake wrote
Reply to comment by cje in by !deleted17657
The funniest thing here is seeing you get upset over it, though.
snake wrote
Reply to comment by cje in by !deleted17657
Oh no, not traffic. How else will we get our advertise- wait.
snake wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by meo in Is Ace exclusion against TOS? by mofongo
Straight women are also negatively effected by commonly held views about sexuality, as well as men who aren't 'macho'.
Ace people do not face oppression that is even similar to what gay and trans people face, and the queer community is essentially defined by that oppression and the response to it. Ace people have historically never been a part of that oppression or the resistance to it, and cishet aces are still far more privileged than gay or trans folx are. There's no reason to dedicate queer resources to cishet ace people.
Its not about some "threshold" but that's literally what "queer" has been defined by.
snake wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted18190 in Is Ace exclusion against TOS? by mofongo
Get out ye pitchforks and torches! Its time to kill the beast!
snake wrote
Reply to Is Ace exclusion against TOS? by mofongo
/u/ziq Do we seriously have truscum on this website or was that just an example? If so, that's gross.
snake wrote
Reply to Is Ace exclusion against TOS? by mofongo
I still don't see how someone can compare being 'bullied and excluded' to 'literally publicly executed in multiple countries'. The concern is cishet ace people entering queer spaces and acting like a cishet person, which is something I've definitely had the pleasure of dealing with in the past. It alone doesn't make them queer, because there is no institutional nor major social oppression based on asexuality alone.
snake wrote (edited )
Reply to “No.” by c0pdislik3r_
For some reason this obvious throwaway joke resonates with me. Anarchists are the only people who respect when you say "no" rather than voting it away or purging you to fix it.