snack
snack wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted8445 in by !deleted8445
yeah, true. or that there is only one form of intelligence, or a somehow superior way to be intelligent
snack wrote
Reply to comment by NoPotatoes in by !deleted8445
crack it open like a coco-nut? something tells me that's not the kind of cracking we're talking about here
snack wrote
Reply to by !deleted8445
i just read something on children's media consumption - the text argued that media consumption is dependent on different things, like age, time of day, environment etc - and one of those categories was the parents level education
and i mean why? i know you read that kind of thing often, but in this case especially it seemed almost non-nonsensical to me. because what does it suggest? that a parent without a certain educational degree doesn't know that reading to the child before bed might be better that random youtube videos? bullshit. that is one class shit-talking another class, mostly in texts, which the latter has no access to (because i mostly read about such things for college or work related stuff), and therefore is never gonna read.
why not look at it from a different angle, like the parents working conditions? say that it's dependent on how much the parents are being exploited to afford to live. how tired they are, when they get home from work and how much energy they have left to be patient with their kids, or whether one parent earns enough so that the other can look after the child's media consumption. end of rant i guess
snack wrote
Reply to by !deleted8445
i got myself an e-reader, it's an old kobo, and it does everything it should so i'm happy with it. thanks again to all the lovelies who shared their insights!
snack wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted30 in by !deleted8445
Wow, that sucks.
I think it admirable though, how you talked it through with your daughter, it sounds like you have a good foundation for communication. Even if she doesn't get the whole picture yet, she'll remember you teaching her stuff and taking the time to explain.
snack wrote
Reply to by !deleted8445
what up, babes?
snack OP wrote
Reply to comment by moonlune in To buy or not to buy? This is about ebook readers by snack
oh, i see. i was talking about this post
snack OP wrote
Reply to comment by catachresis in To buy or not to buy? This is about ebook readers by snack
is boox the same as onyx boox? because damn those are expensive :D the newer versions anyways. directly downloading does sound nice though.
snack OP wrote
Reply to comment by whipskid in To buy or not to buy? This is about ebook readers by snack
minimalist look sounds good! why did you say 'liked', do you not use it anymore?
snack OP wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted31467 in To buy or not to buy? This is about ebook readers by snack
yeah, i thought about doing that too - well, not exactly that, because i don't know what rooting means - but anyways, i am hoping that e-readers will be easier on the eyes?
snack OP wrote
Reply to comment by nulloperation in To buy or not to buy? This is about ebook readers by snack
how do i know that though? i'm guessing it doesn't say so on the package
snack OP wrote
Reply to comment by moonlune in To buy or not to buy? This is about ebook readers by snack
thanks for the informative reply! i already use calibre, albeit not for conversion purposes, but it's good to know i can use it for that should i get a kindle.
i'll buy second hand cause i'm both cheap and poor, so you know. i wouldn't mind it if it were small, the easier it's transportable the better. Reading PDFs would be neat, but it's not a necessity. From what you said i take it you can't zoom in in a PDF then? Backlights are a good idea!
would you say it doesn't matter what version of a kobo/kindle i get? i can't tell the differnence
snack OP wrote
Reply to comment by moonlune in To buy or not to buy? This is about ebook readers by snack
to the gif or to the post?
snack OP wrote
Reply to comment by snack in To buy or not to buy? This is about ebook readers by snack
i'm now reading all the comments of said submission and i'm starting to feel like this gif where someone reads a piece of paper and then goes:
hmm
mhhm
oooh yeah sure
yeah, i know some of these words
snack OP wrote
i'm reading an old submission abt the same topic and there's advertising on e-readers? wahht
snack wrote
Reply to comment by kinshavo in Less Nuns More Lesbians by kinshavo
haha actual radical lesbian nuns - the more you know!
well, thanks for the inspiration, now i know what i'll be for halloween
snack wrote
Reply to comment by moonlune in [Cartoon recommendation] The Owl House: A girl stumbles into a magical world and gets adopted by an anarchist owl witch and her demon dog. by moonlune
oh cool, i didn't know that! maybe they'll create a show together one day :O
snack wrote
Reply to comment by moonlune in [Cartoon recommendation] The Owl House: A girl stumbles into a magical world and gets adopted by an anarchist owl witch and her demon dog. by moonlune
cartoon trivia: the creator of gravity falls is the voice of king in owl house
snack wrote
Reply to comment by snack in Less Nuns More Lesbians by kinshavo
especially historically speaking - joining a covent was the only respectable way for aristocratic women to not marry. which is why i assumed many of those who did were gay or asexual or queer in whatever way.
snack wrote
Reply to Less Nuns More Lesbians by kinshavo
love their body language
also, i was always under the impression that most (or at least many?) nuns were lesbians, no?
snack wrote
Reply to comment by halfway_prince in Chokers by Yatothagod
anyone who wears a choker is hotttt
true
snack wrote
Reply to comment by subrosa in Free talk friday by NoPotatoes
sweet dreams is also one of my most frequent earworms!
sometimes it gets mixed up with another song, maybe because i don't actually listen to it very often and i don't know the whole lyrics or melody.
then it goes something like this:
sweet dreams are made of this
who am i to disagree
uh huh
must be the reason why i'm king of my castle
snack wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted31767 in by !deleted8445
also true! and i like how you worded that