mustard

mustard wrote

oh because i thought they are a sock-puppet , false flag kind of experiment agitating for pretty words and convictions in defense of our beautiful romantic idea . if i can't trust my own perception of reality then what. i don't think they are "bad faith actor", just imagining that it's a thought-experiment

0

mustard wrote

i have thought i'd like to play with bonsai some once we get to that place and have leisure for hobbies. i had some special bonsai tools that a friend gave me but they got taken.

1

mustard wrote

being open to owning property and having a business doesn't make them liberal or fascistic. i thought labelling them as such and moving to ban them is moralizing reactionary , tankie authoritarian. No moralizing is rule #1 in the lifting forum.

when the user said they would like to own a business, one could have suggested a land-trust-cooperative sort of arrangement toward an ethic of anarchist federation where there are somewhat safer places for people to form the affinity group to collaborate on more autonomous projects?

0

mustard wrote

no favorites . i really like every one, can't comparatively evaluate them like that.

finding a salamander always helps to feel some serenity. the seem so content and fearless . once we saw a giant one , about 2 feet long, in the middle of the night , up in the mountains, while really high on mushrooms. the next day, swimming, we felt like amphibians under water.

3

mustard wrote

how is it ableist to insult a trainset?; trainsets don't have any mental capacity. i don't understand how this could be offensive. like, does any slower or duller minded people seriously self-identify as stupid? there are no stupid people in my opinion, only stupid things that people do. nevermind the haters. they don't get to define words for us.

none of your suggested alternatives say what i mean. how about imbecilic, asinine, senseless ?

0

mustard wrote

to participate in non-sensical thought experiment for the sake of humoring Pop's interests : ) in biology and maybe like metaphysical chemistry, feminine and masculine are the basic integral dynamic counterparts in propagation with the masculine as expressive, penetrative and the feminine as intuitive, receiving . one’s unique social gender traits / personality are relative to the culture of the body(s) at play so the conditional balancing combination between these forces is the essence of gendering but i prefer fluid poetry to this categorical hard Science?

2