londoncalling
londoncalling wrote
Reply to The Anti-Capitalist Software License by ziq
this is definitely worse than the Cooperative Software License; you don't necessarily get source code, and I'm kinda worried that 2. doesn't define who is no good well enough
londoncalling wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted24301 in by !deleted8445
on the other hand, that's where he retired after doing colonialism and that kinda thing, which usually looks like a nice place out of context IRL so
londoncalling wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted24301 in by !deleted8445
š°
londoncalling wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted24301 in by !deleted8445
I can't remember if the movie started with a recap of the last movie(s), but uuuh that guy did plop half of the population out of existence before, no?
londoncalling wrote
Reply to comment by a_perfect_map in Your Internet is working. Thank these Cold War-era pioneers who designed it to handle almost anything by ziq
it still is decentralised, I believe they are talking about the ISP to ISP routing stuff which does do routing autonomously and with very good fault tolerance
londoncalling wrote (edited )
londoncalling wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by avbeav in Looking for Firefox alternatives; thoughts? by castwoy
Next has a network resource dispatch system that can be used to kill off JavaScript file requests, at the very least.
londoncalling wrote (edited )
Reply to Hexagonal Architecture by gnvoicu
It keeps the important parts of the application isolated from outer components.
isn't that how every architecture and paradigm is supposed to work
Isolate the core through ports and adapters
and aren't adapters just kludges for object-centric languages that don't let you add arbitrary functions for arbitrary classes? HTTP to internal-representation adapting makes sense, but the program presented doesn't even do that, and it's handled somewhere else
I rate 3/7 ok blogspam, needs more clean code wank
londoncalling wrote
Shut up prescriptivist
londoncalling wrote
Reply to comment by RedOctopus in friend of mine sent me this thread of r/@ by celebratedrecluse
C'est quoi ce bordel?
londoncalling wrote
Reply to comment by ziq in friend of mine sent me this thread of r/@ by celebratedrecluse
Also the point of anarcho-[...] doesn't mean without borders.
C'est quoi ce bordel?
londoncalling wrote
thou misspelt Emacs
londoncalling wrote
silence J*va programmer
londoncalling wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by celebratedrecluse in by !deleted20881
Ask, and thou shall receive. Keep Tesseract around, and thou doesn't need to ask.
How to destroy cell phone towers
Recipe: Standard size cell phone tower, used by two or three cell carriers. Usually at the installation there will be a sign noting the companies.
Ingredients:
- 2-3 comrades
- Entry tools (Boltcroppers, Wiresnips, etc)
- Gloves, Mask, Clean Clothes, Hat, Cap or Hood (for DNA traces)
- Fuel (500ml, White Spirit or Kerosene preferred instead of Benzine/Petrol)
- Fuel (100ml of Benzine/Petrol)
- Firelighters, Several Lighters, Long Pole or Stick (up to 15ft)
- Thick Rags/Towelling (to absorb the fuel)
- Small Tyre which is easy to fit in a rucksack (from Wheelbarrow, Quad Bike, Moto etc)
-
Recon the target. Locate the weak point in the installation, which is where the network cables depart from the mast vertical and enter horizontally or similar into the electrical source, which is usually either a small reinforced building or box. The exposed cables may be located at ground level or up to 15ft up the mast for example. Note estimated timings, entry and exit points, security cameras, motion sensors, lighting etc. Aim to execute the action within 15 mins.
-
Check and enter the site, climb the mast if needed, cut the cable ties that bunch the wires together at the weak point you located earlier. Wedge the tyre in between the cables securely and stuff the tyre with rags and wrap some rags around the cables climbing up the mast from that point. Soak the rags inside the tyre and up the mast with fuel. Take care not to cover yourself with fuel traces, prevent unneeded forensic evidence and do not set yourself on fire. If you are using a pre-made timed incendiary device place it inside the tyre and set it. Climb down.
-
If using a timed device, leave the site immediately. If not, check the site and your exit points quickly. This second check is to prevent any detection, unnecessary injuries or death due to the extended nature of the action.
-
Light the fire using a pole or stick wrapped with fuel-soaked rags, Benzine is better here as the wind can get very strong where these mast are located usually. Light the rags inside the tyre from a distance, getting as far back as possible. If the tyre is small, then the fire is smaller, and detection is lessened. Practice operating in windy environments to get used to using fire at altitude and in difficult circumstances. Leave immediately.
-
Dispose of all materials used in the sabotage action and do not return to the site. Police scientific teams will extensively search the targetās area, entry and exit points, and routes to and from, for any trace of material they can use as evidence.
This recipe is open to be adapted and developed for use wherever it is needed, larger and more complex targets and systems need more developed plans of attack. Trial and error are the guide.
Against 5G & the world which needs it
londoncalling wrote
Reply to Some notes on whitelisting by ziq
May I be whitelisted please?
londoncalling wrote
Reply to comment by JUGhead in The last concern I have with ancom society: marriage / family by JUGhead
No, cause it's gonna explode and go everwhere, and people involved are going to need years of therapy.
londoncalling wrote
Reply to comment by celebratedrecluse in Anti-Left Anarchy: Hunting Leftism with Intent to Kill by mdksmdks
well yes, that's absolutely correct, politics teachers at my school were horrible
londoncalling wrote
If everyone is equal and there's no money then why would we need to get married?
Why would you want to get married? Nothing stops you from doing it with someone consentually without marriage.
Without any of these things, wouldn't the whole institution of marriage / the family go away?
Sounds great. Do you know why they call the nuclear family "nuclear?"
londoncalling wrote (edited )
Leftism isnāt merely deadly in its dullness...
Soviet Union massacred an estimated twenty to forty million people
this Anonymous in particular š¤ school politics teachers
"the Soviet Union is representative of a large portion of left wing ideologies"
and I'll be honest, would be better to defer the killings (I mean it's prolly metaphorical killing, but even still) of anyone until they get dangerous
londoncalling wrote (edited )
Several of the new deep learning tricks are done using a model where two AIs are created called a generative adversarial network; one which creates the deepfakes and one which guesses if its input is real or generated by the former; and the two are used to train each other. It would be very useful if the second type of AI was published, as it could probably detect deepfakes better than a human reading off a list of features to check.
londoncalling wrote
Reply to Water Thieves Steal 80,000 Gallons in Australia as Our Mad Max-Style Future Becomes Reality by mofongo
Wasn't the original Mad Max filmed in rural Australia, and if so, is this a really terrible way to go full-circle?
londoncalling wrote
Reply to In personal security on the internet, would hiring a hacker to stop another hacker be a bad idea? by Smoke_Pole
Probably. I would say "you probably should work on your own opsec", because it is much easier to ensure something doesn't get published than to try and delete every trace of it, but it unfortunately is too late for that now.
My first concern would be that you would have to give your good hacker your information or something of the sort to find it, but it probably gets worse than that somewhere.
londoncalling wrote (edited )
Reply to by !deleted30
cool and good but just saying that guy makes a living off reposting shit and also doing that kind of advertising on reddit where you don't know it's an ad but it's an ad alright
londoncalling wrote
Reply to comment by existential1 in by !deleted2159
Lisp may be a means to an end that has less stuff for its own sake; a programmer is able to use many programming styles, a lot of the system is always available to toy with, and one can invent abstractions that plainly couldn't be doable in other environments. In that way, learning Lisp was the least interesting thing, that it let me do things that I always thought I should have been able to do.