jwkkwb

jwkkwb wrote

To address the consumption concern, i'd suggest local co-operative, diy repair, small/slow farms and wildcrafting/gleaning . some of mine got holes and need repairing.

2

jwkkwb wrote

Veganism refuses human-supremacist moralism.
Anti-racism rejects racist moralism.

imo these positions don't have to become new moralisms. considering this anti-natalism as a similar sense of responsibility regarding an imposed, moral natalism, could be It's, the insensitivity, what's nonsense.

2

jwkkwb wrote

Y: could be, just as are Communism Capitalism Christianity and Consensus, mental objectification / construct, pretend attribution.

N: chaos is that intuitive naive organic activity in apparent absence or ignorance of relational order, or the (anti?)theory that such order doesnt quite exist, \Not a verse or force.

maybe: if each organ is but a transient congregation under Chaos of Wild Nature then all our relations is vibing in rhythm with cosmic Balance. is Mutual-Aid?

idk: how could i, 1 chaote? why do you ask?

idc: what difference would that make to know? maybe not knowing is more preferable.

3

jwkkwb wrote (edited )

A few words hopefully help some for sense in brain and talking ease desire.
name athing capitalist is identify maneuver which exploits advantage for favor advantaged party. critical not just about money, rather regard of every social dynamic. some such implements ethical claim, as imperative and apology, some material as institute-system and military.
capitalist Golden Rule: who has (power-over)makes rule. / dominace is legitimate.

What do you think?

2

jwkkwb wrote

anarchist is an adjective. anarchism and anarchy are nouns. anarchic is adverb.

democracy is power of common people as-opposed-to authoritarian hierarchy.

With/By an anarchism, this collectivity is held accountable, that no majority or bureaucrat should abuse any one .

democracy is not synonymous to a majority-rule paradigm, and not inherently supportive to an institutional state. anarchist people are critical participants within democratic process in opposition to the republic, or resist its imposition. so no. neither for nor against, as a rule.

1

jwkkwb wrote (edited )

Reply to comment by moonlune in Friday Free Talk by asterism

that happened to me today. wonder what is going on. then when i got angry and called fuckery he tells me he is recording this and says othercoworkers are watching me. i am now deciding to go on vacation from that job.

Edit: they are clearly misogynist and transphobic chauvinist bullies! I am so relieved to be done with that particular association.

4

jwkkwb wrote (edited )

No.genuine utopia isnt a destination where to arrive therefore, going through toward it cannot be accomplished.

Yes. other worlds are possible . love to see it . .

"in the side of a hill"

spelunking! utopia be under there? who is this person? they going through this door, too? i don't know. i'll just bring with my own genuine utopia to be safe

3

jwkkwb wrote

HI Justhenry. i have read your comments so "am" somewhat "here", aswell just to see what is going on. I read the comments and feel correspondently. And wish you tidings of warmth and joy

4

jwkkwb OP wrote (edited )

Reply to greetings by jwkkwb

why is my post so downvoted :(

−7