icypaper OP wrote (edited )

Would you not agree that the more developed capitalist nations take control of the underdeveloped ones through control of their infrastructure? This has been pretty part and parcel throughout capitalist history, and I don't think it is eurocentric to acknowledge that. Please explain your understanding further.


icypaper OP wrote (edited )

I would appreciate a more in-depth explanation. As you explained, the common anarchist view(beyond the ancoms I have experience with) do not view capitalism from the "oppressor-oppressing" class standpoint that a Marxist would view the stages of economy on, but rather the more simple metric of "is there authority in this system?" Also, explain who you think the transition from feudalism to capitalism did and didn't benefit.