confusedarchist

confusedarchist OP wrote

I've been called a fucking nerd, told to shut the fuck up, been called so cute in a derogatory manner, told to fuck off, asked what the fuck is wrong with me, been threatened with being beat up for valuing freedom of speech,

The list goes on...

−2

confusedarchist wrote

Reply to comment by ziq in Lemmy on anticivs by ziq

I think it's colonialist and racist for you to say you know what other people want and to use black people as pawns in your online politics games.

1

confusedarchist wrote

I think beliving we need aliens to save society is a little strange but it's still a leftist ideology.

It's wrong because you're deciding for all of us what's "against anarchism" like people are even downvoting me for saying I don't want to exclude democratic socialists from anarchism even though they're libertarians.

−1

confusedarchist wrote

Reply to comment by polpotisevil2 in Lemmy on anticivs by ziq

No I didn't... Anarcho primitivism has colonialism right in its name, it frames non white races as primitives or subhumans. Anarcho-communism is for everyone, not just white people who want to eat berries and wear furs.

−1

confusedarchist wrote

I would say the destination is more important than the method. Achieving the communist society is more important than the journey you take to reach the communist society. It's elitist / sectarian to say the exact path you take is more important than the act of getting there.

1

confusedarchist wrote

Reply to comment by ziq in Lemmy on anticivs by ziq

I know this is supposed to be making some kind of point but it's really not because anarcho-communism isn't colonialist like anarcho-primitivism.

−2