I am not saying that these people there should work for the regions but for solidarity and mutual help between these countries and regions. Of course it would be there decision and of course we would not make them export it just so we can have it like "polpotisevil" said

Yes that's of course great but you can't deny that even for your perfect social anarchist society (on your picture) we would need special metals which don't exist on much of the world!

Why would people work less in a ancol or ansyn society? That's a thing that capitalists say as a argument against libertarian socialism or social anarchism

In the sense of worker solidarity it would make sense to work and get help and develope your region. I don't see a problem here. It would not be the working conditions like under capitalism.

Saying that this problem should be solved is a kind of lazy answer in my opinion. It's fact that for solar energy or wind energy or stuff with rubber you would need to import.

Well I just realised that I wanted to say CONfederation. That would make more sense my mistake.

You still haven't answered about "liberal communes doesn't make any fucking sense"

First of no need to get vulgar I am trying to get a simple discussion going.

I don't understand either of your points could you explain please why they don't make sense or aren't anarchism?

Sorry again the language barrier

May I ask what ideology you are?

Why wouldn't they work. Of course it would not be the same slavery in this capitalist system.

If you would get support for your region and could develop I think it would be a great opertunity.

Also for clean energy you would need special metals to build solar or wind power plants. In 80% of the world you wouldn't get these and the idea falls apart

Social anarchism is in my book the forms ancom, ancol, ansyn and mutualism which relie on solidarity and work in a socialist way

Yeah well in anarchism there could be many federated, decentral and liberal communes which could govern themself but still be connected in the great scale

How is it rascist? If these countries would also go anarcho communist for example it would be great to import and export in exchange of other workers or programs who would help them get better developing other technology, methods for agriculture, education and so on.

This! I thought about it the same way and it bothered me. Social anarchism and communism are such great ideas but this is a big problem in my opinion

Thats a great idea and much better than the idea of "just live with what you got".

In mutualism there is also this kind of bank. I don't know the specifics but it workes in quite a good way.

Thats a great idea but my question was about money in the sense that you can't have everything in one small commune/region/collective. The problem is getting money for importing important stuff without the actual use if money in the communes/regions

Hey!

Collectivist anarchism and the idea of labor vouchers goes as follows:

The needs such as housing, food and water are free but now there are the things you WANT to have.

You work and then get paid for your work according to the time you worked and the importance of work in society. The importance would of course be decided before actually implementing labor vouchers. With these labor vouchers you can buy luxury items on a non capitalist market in the sense that you give a certain amount of vouchers in exchange for example a watch. After your purchase the vouchers will be destroyed for the purpose of not getting anyone rich.

It's a bit like a fusion of mutualism and collectivism.

The reason I put nation in quotes is because of my language barrier and I didn't knew how else to put it.

I don't think and also don't want competition in my anarchist economy but I think if regions are more developed then others that is still inequality and without certain things you need you would get less developed.

Also thanks for the recommendation :)

For example the northern part of Germany is very very flat and much of the agriculture such as wheat grows there. But they would have no way in getting things like metals. They could sustain themselves with enough food and water of course but in terms of technology they would be worse than west Germany or other regions

Inequality in the sense that regions with those resources will have more technology, goods or products than those in regions without them. Even with mutual help between regions it would have to be a big area for all kind of resources to be shares between them

Roads, houses, factories or workplaces. These are important and without certain resources you can't build nor operate them

Yes of course but you have to acknowledge that most if our products we use on a daily basis happen to be created with some kind of natural resource. Ecological collapse is of course a bigger problem but not producing anything would make you fall behind everyone else and inequality would still exist

Hmm okay good idea. Then we should also concentrate in finding other materials or resources that are not limited and can be used in the same way. Anyways it leads to some big starting problems in my opinion

But as I said in the comment above you what about regions that don't have iron or stuff like that. They would get stuck and could not produce anything what might be important

Yeah of course that would be great but what about areas that don't have iron or steel for example. People couldn't produce anything or couldn't build houses for example