Just want to say I was about to give the same argument in a reply to another comment, and thank /u/selver for doing that for me. :P

I do not respect you, and you are not an authority on memes either. It would seem, then, that this is simply a butting of heads with no actual basis either way.

I will ask one simple question; if you will not justify the post as a meme in any way or give a definition of 'meme', how is any moderator meant to viably enforce the one rule in the sidebar? Or is the fact that you 'don't answer to me' (you don't and don't need to) meant to mean that I should simply allow all posts to stand that violate this rule and re-establish this as a general content subraddle, otherwise facing demodding?

I could put any political opinion I want on a relevant image with impact text (like that shitty whisper app made specifically to do that) but that doesn't immediately qualify it as a meme.

ok

Then I will delete content that doesn't seem to be a 'meme' to me. If there is no line to be drawn, it is not possible to viably enforce the only subraddle rule; that is, do not post non-meme or non-humorous content.

Explain, then, how it was a meme. Because there are no strict guidelines, meaning its currently up to the mod's eyes.

I didn't find that one to be a meme. If I cared to censor you, I would have deleted plenty of others- which I disagree with to a further extent. That specific one looked to me to just be you expressing an opinion through impact text with not even a vague attempt at humor under it.

The rule does say non-meme content may be deleted, and 'political opinion demonstrated via impact text' does not qualify as a meme so far as I am aware.

they're breaking the ToS with their shitty modding

Looking at the ToS right now. Mind explaining that part?

They deleted an anti-transhumanist meme I made that they apparently didn't find funny

The definition of 'funny' is objectively subjective (funny term) and it is not anything I could describe as a meme other than 'has impact text'. If that's the only requirement, I could post any political statement in the form of an image with impact text and claim it met the requirements.

In the comment, I literally asked for you to explain why I shouldn't delete it, waited over a day, then deleted it.

adds nothing to the convo and is antagonistic' (on a fucking meme forum)

That doesn't mean you should be overly antagonistic without any provocation within the thread whatsoever, in a reply to... your own comment. However- I should not have deleted the comment. I will refrain from deleting similar cases in the future.

oh yeah ive put basic reading into most things but if you tell me to read the book of, say, Lenin, ill tell you to eat my ass because ill never take leninism into consideration

at least reading the fuckin wikipedia page is important but reading entire books is a waste of time

death to all tankies will come to you but only if you reply Thanks Little Father

i mean personally i wouldnt waste time reading an ideology id immediately dismiss

i havent read mein kampf but im not a fan of hitler; reading someones own books about the ideology is generally a waste of time unless you already have some interest in it

herbal alternatives to hrt

One thing I'd like to note is, whilst not anywhere on the green vs transhumanist spectrum or whatever (I don't know enough to plot myself there), the herbal alternatives generally don't do shit, so the processed pills are kinda nice to have. Horse piss also works, though.

This adds nothing and is antagonistic itself. Would like to delete but always give a grace period for someone to call me a fucking moron and explain why I shouldn't. Also, the site used for this post fuckin' sucks.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amanita_Design

like literal full on ad deals

Starting on /w/streetmedic. Slow, but should be able to mirror it. Will be ugly until I find out how to make pretty.

The gas attack was actually rather legitimate; the rebels were holded up in an urban stronghold that would be nearly impossible to crack without just turning it to rubble. The losses strikes would bring are negligible to retaking the entirety of the city.

Ignoring the rest of the slaughter and the FSA's many, many crimes that outnumber even the fascist Assad's crimes, however, is entirely bullshit and I agree with you there.

Chemical weapons are generally useful when you have an opponent already entrenched, and can outweigh any negatives.

Yeah, PBS is generally solid, I'm gonna second that.

Not sure on Amanita Design. Half their games are literally NIke ads.

I am now your Shah today
Now I command all of you
Now you're going to pray in school
I'll make sure they're Christian too