I don't see what hierarchy has to do with it. I just didn't agree with your comment or consider it at all compatible with socialism.

I greatly admire the way you've stood up to transphobes in the past and shut down their abuse, you're one of my personal heroes. Who are your heroes?

Damn, I had no idea.

I wonder if Ditko got any money from all those spidey movies? Stan Lee is always listed as a producer, but never the others.

All raddle means is "to mark or paint with red dye"

Your sheep fucking analogy is all you.

How very communist of you.

Raddle is pretty motivating! With a few exceptions, everyone here inspires me to keep working on my projects.

You're an anarchist in a non-anarchist society. So I guess you're not really an anarchist...

Everyone saying that anarcho-transhumanism is bad because it's not 100% voluntary when nothing is 100%.

You just disproved your own point. If us communists can own iphones under capitalism and still be communists, then anarcho-transhumanists can modify themselves under capitalist-transhumanism and still be anarcho-transhumanists. As long as you support the equal distribution of technology, then you still qualify as an anarcho-transhumanist. Capitalism giving you more than others because you were born middle class in the West doesn't change that.

Communism and post-scarcity go hand in hand, so that's not really an issue. There's more than enough for everyone, but capitalists keep it restricted to only the wealthy.

Then you should support communist / anarchist transhumanism so that everyone gets access to the technology.

I mean, I didn't decide what 'anarcho-transhumanism' is, it's been pre-defined as a communist, hierarchy-less ideology.

If a political theory doesn't evolve with the times, it will be left behind.

Yes. So let's not impede progress by clinging to impossible political purity.

You could say the same about all communists.

But those wouldn't be anarcho-transhumanists, they'd be capitalist-imperialists. A big reason to support anarcho-transhumanism is to provide a non-oppressive alternative to capitalist-imperialist-transhumanism.

So literally:

progress is bad, we should stay the same forever and never evolve or strive to reach new heights

As far as I understand, anarcho-transhumanism would only exist if communism existed. So within this scenario being presented, yes.

Why would we need to compete with each other under communism?

And they can always have their DNA recoded after the fact. No reason it needs to be restricted to the unborn.

What repurcussions? Getting picked last for baseball? If that's really a big deal then just outlaw discrimination. But there are plenty of kids getting picked last for baseball already, this would mean less of us would suffer that shame. It brings more of us into equal footing and paves the road to true equality. Think about it.

How would they suffer?

You could say the same thing about us giving birth at all. The kids didn't choose to be born, so what right do we have to create any new life..?

See, if you get this pedantic, you can label anything 'involuntary', even down to the formation of the universe way back when.