ShadesPath wrote

You don't have to police your emotions but it's not healthy to be this upset over an internet argument especially when you consistently get into internet arguments and a lot of them end up with you getting mad at whoever you're arguing with. I say just let it all go, man, and do something that's worth the emotions you're feeling.


ShadesPath wrote

Love all the criticisms y'all but this was meant for an entire community. Your arguments against this only work if you assume this was meant to function as solely an anarchist structure. Keep in mind, it's still a bad idea given that groups that have functioned like this in the past tend to dissolve or splinter due to internal strifes brought about by the "trickle-down" nature of the structure and the slow accumulation of power the elected tend to gain but arguing that its bad because it isn't anarchist isn't gonna work because it isn't meant to be anarchist.


ShadesPath wrote (edited )

Reply to eminem by Mirio

No one ever said the man was always a GOAT lol

But I gotta wonder if people honestly think GOAT is an exclusionary title...


ShadesPath wrote (edited )

Reply to comment by metocin in Hormone Blockers is Civilization by d4rk

I don't think this is anything about anticiv being transphobic but rather an authoritarian futurist take on biological change due to available technology. On the one hand, assuming puberty blockers are good for everyone and thus should be mandatory for everyone is a definite "hell no gtfo" but on the other they're right that biology changes with civilization but they're off in saying that it "should" change which goes back to them sounding really authoritarian. Also, puberty blockers stopping pedophilia is just wild.