RedIsNowGreen

RedIsNowGreen OP wrote (edited )

Wrong... Apparently you don't have access to my online profile, as reading it would have precluded your question. Hope this helps you:

"Post-Left eco-anarchist, agorist, anti-capitalist, anti-fascist, anti-zionist, climate change realist, pro Palestine/Gaza/Zapatista - believer that social wedge issues like race/religion/gender are exploited by Haves to keep HaveNots divided rather than uniting to oppose their common oppressors."

−1

RedIsNowGreen OP wrote

I did not join this forum to promote a narrow agenda that might require I limit myself to postings only of articles whose content or authors whose point of view I agree with entirely. My purpose here is to learn from fellow activists, to offer up what I have learned over 50 years of activism, and to share information I believe might be of interest or benefit to others.

−3

RedIsNowGreen OP wrote

In my experience I have encountered as many "Far Right Libertarians" as I have "Far Left Anarchists", with many on both sides dissing the other despite their common anti-government stance. To me, as the poem I quoted earlier asserts, this is just more proof of the fallacy/falsity of the overall Left/Right political paradigm, because in this context at least there is a point at which Far Left and Far Right do indeed intersect.

−3

RedIsNowGreen OP wrote

"Everything" cannot be important - at least not at the same time. To "win", one must prioritize then pick their battles. Choosing battles around which the broadest alliances can be formed increases the chance for success. Myopic focus on objectives that benefit relatively few while ignoring or alienating many plays right into the hands of the HAVEs, who work hard to keep the HAVENOTs focused on our differences rather than our similarities, thereby minimizing the likelihood that we will ever unite (at least long enough) to overcome our common oppressors.

−2