Of course, that's step one.

How should the situation be dealt with, you think, when a worker goes to bosses that try to intervene and split the group?

What's the anarchist alternative(s)?

What's the alternative way of making collective decisions, if consensus can't be reached?

?

"no"

What?

It is spelled out in the article

Well said

Did y'all read the article at the top? If not, at least read this summary before posting

https://libcom.org/article/tldr-we-need-united-class-not-united-left

Is that something I can eat?

What?

The next question: Is the "dual anarcho thing" wise? I.e. that anarchists belong to a specific platformist/especifismo organisation AND mass unions.

"Welcome to the wonderful world of anarcho-nihilism."

Sounds like a squat for drug addicts and alcoholics

I am against liberal capitalism and against liberal states

"anarchy is when you kill society"

What?

How am I liberal?

Good luck with getting along with other people

"Guess what, I don't care if people join the anarchist 'movement' or not."

You don't want to achieve a post-capitalist anarchy?

"Let the economies overlap, then. There is no reason for a singular form of economy to be imposed on a society."

Sounds good. But if people won't compromise and reach a consensus, then a majority decision is needed I think.

Not a liberal

"I don't care"

Now that's a serious way of challenging state and capitalism. Loads of people will join an anarchist movement.

Ok thief

Not much of a clarification. If one part of the population wants plan economy only, one part market economy only, and one part a mix. All proposals can't be implemented. Majority decision is a solution.