Thank you!

Thank you for your input!

Thank you! A few comrades have recommended Write.as as well, sounds like it is a worthwhile option!

Thank you so much!

Thank you for the detailed response!

Thanks for sharing your perspective! I'm not a fan of the vibe Medium gives off, either.

Thank you for your input!

Thanks, your reassurance is appreciated :) Emma Goldman is on my reading list, hopefully, I'll have time to read her soon.

Thanks. It is important to learn history from multiple angles, even though it is incredibly difficult to navigate them without being skewed in a direction of one's bias (at least, for me).

Kropotkin certainly wrote unappealing (to say the least) words about Lenin; and so did Lenin about Kropotkin (in some of his famous works, he called Kropotkin an anarcho-chauvinist). The complexity of relationship between anarchists and communists cannot be reduced to approachable one-liners, and I tried to present the encounter somewhat neutrally (which I most likely didn't achieve in the light of my simplistic call to unity). I filmed this video three times and decided to just go with it. Learning historical context is incredibly important, and is wrought with uncertainty - how much was each account revised, how heavily did the narrator's bias influence the representation of facts, etc. There are few sources I am convinced are trustworthy, and reading theory to me, at this point, is somewhat less excruciating. Thanks for engaging!

Thanks!

Thank you so much for your kind and thoughtful words!

True.

Thank you!

Thank you so much!

Confirmation bias and cherry-picking fallacy are very difficult to avoid. Erich Fromm in The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness looks at much data and comes to many fascinating conclusions concerning the "human nature".

Thank you for your thoughtful response! I'll look into your suggestions.

Thanks for the suggestion!

Thanks, I'll check it out.