It would work tho too vague to be useful. Cuz nuerodivergent is used for just about anything. While I'm hoping to get a connotation that makes normies think I'm a potential serial killer or insane person worth not taking seriously.

Yeah I largely agree tho there is utility in terms and I think there is something really cool with positively viewing describing oneself with openly negative terms.

That could be cool. I'd be down to join . I bet u could get some other too

Yeah this is kinda the problem. Out of touch doesn't give u to cook terrifying name that people have like if u describe urself as psychotic.

Yeah I agree. But it's not really surprising I think most anarchists are wrong and have 95% terrible opinion so ancal types being the same is no real surprise.

This excerpt by rothbard is actually useful in child liberation disscussions imo. Now he is very wrong on many things so I reject most parts of it. But child liberation has very few texts on how to relate to children in more libertary ways that aren't written by people who wanna rape minors. ANd rothbards critique of modern ways of treating kids is just true. How kids are stuck in foster care bc government agencies make it really hard for people to take care of them, how kids are punished for promoting their autonomy unjustly bc modern society actually treats kids as property and the nonsense of the judicial system and public schools

The positive program of a few adults having a temporary guardian position where they can give positive things to kids but aren't allowed to do negative things in the same way u can't force other adults to ur will. is not perfect but a vast imporvment from what most do. And the line of adulthood and childhood being when one can successfully take care of oneself without guardians is a still imperfect but a vastly better way to determine consent than age. And its pretty radical in that it says the ability to be free for children is to be taken by them as soon as they choose and are able to be a free agent.

This is all ery flawed but provides some pretty decent barebones of a way better way to interact with minors. Its a good start and thats it.

https://mises.org/library/children-and-rights

This is kinda silly bc rothbard doesn't even argue for owning children as slalves. Its really obvious and clear in the writing. I mean I have plenty of disagreements so I think its unnecessary to just promote a falsehood. Not saying u made it up but I'm certain the people who claim rothbard promotes child slavery are lying on purpose.

Idk I just think idol worship is bad regardless. So I would still have complaints if it's zerzan. Tho tbh zerzan pretty recognizable.

I found it very funny how ur defenes of ted k was pretty obviously anti anarchists so u just delted it and posted more ted k memes lol. like I think ted k has values but its really weird when people act like a pro authoritarian mysogynist is anarchist alligned.

I agree that Ted is anti civ lol

Doesn't make him Anarchist

I don't speak for /u/ziq tho I would enjoy new users being around..I'll be honest solar punk is seen as kinda idealistic but getting closer. So a bit of disagreements are to be expected but idk that's what makes anarchy interesting to me. People being free to think for themself will of course result in many different ideas on how to live.

But like dissagrements are way different from not wanting people arround. Fresh voices critical of how I think is something I would be welcome to see..

The only thing that might be important if u do send a bunch of users is to make a sticky or something with the terms of service for raddle. It's more strict on anti oppression stuff than reddit generally. The big one usually is people get pretty thoroughly criticized if they use things like fatness or disability as insults. Which disappointing does get conflict with some.

Honestly phillipines get brought up very infrequently but I see talk of it a relatively decent amount bc there are quite a few anarchists in the phillipines in social media spaces I use.

Which I wish there is way more bc hearing about usa and on ocassion Canada or UK gets old AF.

Oh that makes sense

I'm insulted that u would think I would sleep in a bed.

Tho fr I do sleep in a bed Everyonce and a while.

What does liberal brainrot mean in this context? Like do u think current reddirs take on anarchy is worse than this or?

Maybe anarchy is actually pro hierarchy. Idk seems wrong but so many people disagree.

I actually disagree that Ted k is a maoist. I also think it's a bad reading to think Ted k is anti authority in any real way. F.p. on Twitter actually writes to Ted k often and posts some of his letters on Twitter. And like they will ask Ted k about racism and Ted will be against racism but bc racism will result in different races fighting each other and war needs industry.

Ted find oppression and authority to be kinda unimportant background issues. Ted wants to abolish industry and promotes it by any way possible bc otherwise would be destruction of humans. Ted k isn't an eco fash bc he thinks ecofash uses racism will requires industry.

He is more of a single issue anti industry authoritarian. Which isn't very far from marxists in being anti anarchists. I'm sure Ted k has many anarchists compatible views but they don't come from anarchisra values. He just so happens to be the same as anarchy sometimes. but as soon as he thinks it won't be the ideal anti industry he will be pro authority.

Bc Ted k cares way more about anti industry than anarchy. I also haven't read a ton of Ted k so I could be wrong. But I really struggle to see how Ted k could be anarchist.

move a lot, often very short distances

Me too I move to lots of places like the living roomx the kitchen, the basement sometimes outside

DHS ai scrapping raddle to identify potential terrorism when?

Oh that a typo I* not U