It's absolutely a great thing, I support it 100%. And will likely be more embraced when capitalism (which is pro-natalist to the core) runs its course, as well as being perpetuated by young folks, women, and queer people who are trying to liberate themselves, since patriarchy forces child-bearing/child-rearing upon everybody (can't keep up a nation's strength if more workers and soldiers aren't being pumped out like clockwork). Hell, I'd say pro-natalism is a core tenent of fascism, since it views people as nothing more but property that must create more property (in this case, being children). Then, of course, we get into the ecological problems of natalism, such as the inevitably razing and destroying of lands and species, ravaging the Earth, overpopulation, ramped-up consumption, which causes states and economies to grow, or want to grow, leading to imperialism, etc.
I completely forgot about my old Tumblr. Dunno how you even found that, or knew what you were looking for...or why you found it. But, I'm not a Nazi. That's plainly evident by everything I've ever wrote. Plus, I'm queer and half Mexican. Guess I just thought that the Wolfsangel looked cool. But, I can assure you I'm not fascist in the least.
Pretty much my response to the "anticiv = no food", as though civilization and industrialism are getting hella food and not hovering right above the poverty line (if not already below it).
Industrial society is the one starving billions of people to death and sacrificing them upon what is essentially a glorified blood altar. That's just human casualties, without factoring in animals, plants, waterways, the air, etc. And because industrial society subsumed pretty much everyone and everything into it, its collapse will lead to a lot of devastation, as LITERALLY ANY upheaval would. However, it would also lead to a lot more liberation and freedom, given that industrial society is a totalitarian bastard that wants to annihilate all life.
And obviously, I disagree heavily and think it's truly fucked how many people genuinely think animal liberation efforts are "abusive", falling for propaganda so effectively
Considering civilization is built upon animal abuse and the genocide of non-human entities, yeah, it makes sense for the state to pull a doublespeak and say that any action which may relieve them of such a situation is, in fact, terribly abusive
I suppose an intentional forgetting of the civilized condition would be the best way to live how the Natural Order Movement suggests, or at least, something similar.
I'm troubled by both, although research is a lot more openly brutal, whereas zoos are more implicitly brutal and the brutality lies in the concept and behind the scenes, whereas the horrors of vivisection are able to be seen right away and are hard to hide. And yes, I agree. Those who liberate animals are my heroes, and I respect them immensely. Takes so much courage and knowledge I doubt I'll ever have, and I have no ill will towards those people. Anarchists who do have a problem with it...well, I don't understand it.
I suppose that's a fair point, and maybe he didn't think it through very thoroughly (understandably so), but I still support any and all actions against zoos and liberating animals from them, and he had good intentions.
But I suppose Baedan or something of the sort of the sort, more focused and lengthy and in-depth, would serve as a useful guide in that regard. The manifesto touches on several things, in a short amount of pages, and isn't trying to be academic or incredibly in-depth. For what it is, a small booklet that combines/intertwines many subjects I'm very passionate about and brings them all together, instead of viewing them as isolated, as well as reworking or expounding upon already established things to plumb their depths for me, it does a fantastic job, and is probably one of the best things I've read in recent memory.
I had never thought about that, but, I suppose that makes sense. Though I suppose, being such a short little booklet, it probably wasn't going to be very detailed in that regard.
Eden’s Demise
I FEEL LIKE I’M FUCKING DYING
Trans rights activists storm CDMX Congress protesting PAN deputy
THIS IS ACTIVE OPPOSITION
Saw this on the train yesterday morning :)
Texas man jailed in Dallas monkey case says he'd do it again
GoddamnedVoodooMagic wrote
Reply to What do you think about antinatalism? by tprk
It's absolutely a great thing, I support it 100%. And will likely be more embraced when capitalism (which is pro-natalist to the core) runs its course, as well as being perpetuated by young folks, women, and queer people who are trying to liberate themselves, since patriarchy forces child-bearing/child-rearing upon everybody (can't keep up a nation's strength if more workers and soldiers aren't being pumped out like clockwork). Hell, I'd say pro-natalism is a core tenent of fascism, since it views people as nothing more but property that must create more property (in this case, being children). Then, of course, we get into the ecological problems of natalism, such as the inevitably razing and destroying of lands and species, ravaging the Earth, overpopulation, ramped-up consumption, which causes states and economies to grow, or want to grow, leading to imperialism, etc.