Dumai
Dumai wrote
Reply to by !deleted30
not invested in whatever debate spawned this post but heterosexuality isn't just an orientation or an identity, its an institution of patriarchal social reproduction in the first place. correct that its not the cause of patriarchy because patriarchy predates it but its part and parcel of how patriarchy is lived in the modern age
Dumai wrote
Reply to comment by unvaccinatedcomedian in One thing that confuses me. by Exlurker
do not do this its terrible
Dumai wrote
Reply to comment by ziq in What's the anarchist take on Cuba? To what degree can it be called a socialist country? by Tequilx_Wolf
well exactly.
Dumai wrote
Reply to What's the anarchist take on Cuba? To what degree can it be called a socialist country? by Tequilx_Wolf
to the degree that it's a socialist country. socialism means a lot of things to a lot of people and not all of those meanings are incompatible with capitalism or even feudalism.
Dumai wrote (edited )
Reply to Which frog by ziq
spinach leaf. maggie can go fuck herself, prelasparian feudalist fuckhead. i'm cancelling this frog
Dumai wrote
When you won last year’s L’Oréal-UNESCO Prize for Women in Science
not to disparage this woman or her research but the WHAT
Dumai wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted13038 in by !deleted13038
it's traditional
Dumai wrote
Reply to by !deleted13038
ngl i quite like this band but i always thought this version of the song kinda sucked
Dumai OP wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by !deleted23972 in theorists you regret reading? by Dumai
i guess i don't necessarily regret reading academic theory because it's bad -- tho i'm not saying its good either -- but because i tried to grapple with it before i was really equipped to understand the conversations & debates this stuff is all written in response to, which led to a lot of embarassing confusions & misunderstandings on my part. when really just reading marx and other communist stuff would have been a better use of my time at that fertile stage
academic marxism is... not great, on the whole, i will grant you that. aside from that i'd say foucault has his place. no time for derrida or deleuze tho
Dumai OP wrote
Reply to theorists you regret reading? by Dumai
e.g. i spent a long time believing marxist dialectics were phallogocentric/latently sexist because of luce irigaray
Dumai wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by kinshavo in Deep Ecology? What are the critiques from a Green Anarchy pov? (Or generally what Raddle thinks about It) by kinshavo
well savitri's only called a deep ecologist in retrospect because her views on animal rights and environmentalism overlap so much with what "deep ecology" means now. little bit ahistorical on my part soz
Dumai wrote (edited )
Reply to Deep Ecology? What are the critiques from a Green Anarchy pov? (Or generally what Raddle thinks about It) by kinshavo
wouldn't say it's necessarily ecofash but it probably matters that there were actual ex-nazis among its earliest proponents, without even getting into the likes of linkola and foreman. but the misanthropy, eugenics, malthusianism, racism -- i mean that sounds like most people's description of eco-fascism, but that's just as easily lib shit half the time. anyway here's a critique from an actual anprim, ironically hitting on a lot of stuff people ding anprims for nowadays. quite frankly i have always found the fact this essay exists hilarious, though i wish he went harder on them for the malthusianism
Dumai wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by Dumai in Friday Free Talk 04/06: Only a few hours left till the WEEKEND by moonlune
stealing your vocab from leninists is bad enough but when it amounts to a kind of gradualist, reformist version of platformism then that's even worse that just being a leninist
Dumai wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by Dumai in Friday Free Talk 04/06: Only a few hours left till the WEEKEND by moonlune
this includes tiqqun. that's just more immediatist, insurrectionary dual power anarchism
Dumai wrote
i hate dual power anarchists so much
Dumai wrote
Reply to Will Israel be held accountable for war crimes? by ziq
not enough for it to matter. too many countries depend on israel strategically in the middle east. i see this more as an attempt to save face
Dumai OP wrote (edited )
Reply to Even when Hollywood liberals are right they have to walk it back to save their careers: "Avengers star Mark Ruffalo apologises for suggesting Israel is 'committing genocide' on Twitter" by Dumai
i don't want to make this about me and the last thing we need right now is anti-zionist jews continuing to centre themselves at the expense of palestinians but: i wavered on this shit for a long time, far longer than should be remotely excusable, and part of the reason was the constant arm-twisting from even my "anti-zionist" friends and family members pressuring me not do a "blood libel" by seeing the colonisation of palestine for what it is. for years i resorted to calling it "ethnic cleansing" exclusively because that was the furthest i could go without being accused of internalised antisemitism, and i wasn't confident enough in my own convictions to face that. i know that's a first world problem, and don't get me wrong, i don't bring this up to earn pity points or monologue about my "experiences as an ally" because i'd never show my face in public if i ever caught myself doing that, but i want to point out that even people who claim to support palestinians, even sincerely, can turn around and minimise the consequences of the israeli state project
like i know nobody here would expect better from mark ruffalo but this shit makes me miserable because seeing big names like him calling might at least, and i do mean at least, be taken as a sign that the acceptable discourse on palestine was moving in the right direction. but no, i guess not
Dumai wrote
zerzan breaks my heart sometimes, i think he's an idiot but he has such faith in human beings :(
Dumai wrote
sometimes i think about how the human race will probably go extinct sometime early next century
Dumai wrote (edited )
Reply to Could lower vaccine doses be key to ending the pandemic? by ziq
more accurate to say that in the face of vaccine inequality it'll have to do