DissidentRage
DissidentRage wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted1196 in Who owns this server now? Is it still Ziq? by elyersio
It's not, because this is a problem I have in meatspace.
DissidentRage wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by !deleted1196 in Who owns this server now? Is it still Ziq? by elyersio
I'm sorry it came off that way. But you were basically saying that running another Postmill instance was a sheer act of will.
Edit: Thank you for perusing my entire post history and downvoting all of it. Because that isn't an infantile reaction to disagreement.
DissidentRage wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted1196 in Who owns this server now? Is it still Ziq? by elyersio
Well it's going to be difficult to quote you and point to what I was referring to when you've edited the post.
DissidentRage wrote
Reply to comment by ziq in Leftist Smurf by ziq
I wouldn't accuse someone of engaging in those practices if they didn't engage in those practices.
That is exactly what you did in the linked post.
Everyone has blind spots, some that we'll eventually overcome, and some that will always be with us.
You weren't addressing blind spots, you were saying that people who aren't in your camp overtly do liberal things to sidestep being called out for sectarianism.
I don't work against everyone else.
Surely you can understand where I'm coming from when you say shit like "Nah, fuck society still." and have made kinda gritty remarks elsewhere where you seem to relish the disagreements. Maybe you're just shitposting but after a while it starts to wear a little thin.
If we're not able to be self critical, what's even the point of calling ourselves anarchists?
I just think you've gone beyond the point of good faith criticism.
Left unity is a meme because anarchy was never meant to be part of 'the left'.
Left unity is a "meme" when people actively reject cooperation with people not in their specific camp when the reality is that the kind of world we're trying to create (one without capital and oppressive systems) is still mostly hypothetical and may have crises and conditions we can't foresee. Still try to get as close to your goal as possible but don't reject it all if you don't get everything on your wish list. The world isn't yours, you're going to be sharing it with the rest of us, too.
DissidentRage wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted1196 in Who owns this server now? Is it still Ziq? by elyersio
At what point was I dismissing working together? I was pointing out that you were underestimating the required effort. And now you're just immediately becoming hostile for no reason other than not wanting to take any sort of criticism.
DissidentRage wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted1759 in Who owns this server now? Is it still Ziq? by elyersio
You're at least considering what's required and addressing it, which is the expectation I was holding the previous poster to. We should be above hand-waving shit.
DissidentRage wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted1196 in Who owns this server now? Is it still Ziq? by elyersio
The second paragraph of your post makes my point. It's not as simple as just willing something into existence. I thought people here would know better than to use that kind of logic.
DissidentRage wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted1196 in Who owns this server now? Is it still Ziq? by elyersio
Sounds like "wanting it bad enough" logic but okay. There are material prerequisites to running something like this and even getting it to have a sizable enough userbase to make it a worthwhile investment of time.
DissidentRage wrote
It sounds like you're totaling data per user per day per week and generating a report for that?
As far as inserting data into your display table, it should only be running a query that sums up the information when you need to display it. No database table necessary for that. You could save it into a report if you really wanted to. That would need a new structure.
DissidentRage wrote
Reply to Why are you single? by ziq
I am recently single because of my not being a liberal and thus having a "negative" view of everything.
That said, being on the market again after almost 7 years feels really weird.
DissidentRage wrote
Reply to comment by libre_dev in Why are you single? by ziq
As someone who isn't autistic, sometimes telling interest is legit difficult. Different people have different ways of expressing it, and acting on something that would be one person's signal of interest with someone else can make for some pretty cringey awkwardness. You also have people who are very plainly interested but deny it or refuse to act on it, probably because of fears based on past history.
DissidentRage wrote
Reply to comment by go1dfish in I've built a decentralized reddit clone in javascript on top of the gun db. Notabug.io's policy and design mirrors reddit from around 2012 but other nodes can censor more or less content. Still early and WIP, suggestions and PRs welcome by go1dfish
Front-end JS is not accessible because it requires that the client both has it enabled and runs it properly. There are many reasons why this would not be the case.
DissidentRage wrote
Reply to I've built a decentralized reddit clone in javascript on top of the gun db. Notabug.io's policy and design mirrors reddit from around 2012 but other nodes can censor more or less content. Still early and WIP, suggestions and PRs welcome by go1dfish
Pure front-end Javascript is bad for accessibility and security. Cool exercise in ability, but the approach is fatally flawed.
DissidentRage wrote
Reply to comment by ziq in Leftist Smurf by ziq
You're not going to really improve anyone else's politics when you seem to intentionally misattribute liberal practices to anyone that doesn't adhere to your specific tenets regardless of whether or not they actually partake in those practices. Instead you're just going to look like a stereotype and people are going to close themselves off to you in particular because you are coming across as arguing from bad faith.
If "left unity is a meme" truly then it's not because of failures of tendencies to align, but because some very vocal and rhetorically powerful actors actively want to work against everyone else.
DissidentRage wrote
Reply to Left Unity by Fossidarity
Charlie Brown then goes on to create a hit list for liberal governments, establishing himself as a fiction author whose work hinges on an uncritical acceptance of liberal propaganda, while somehow managing to not be regarded as counter-revolutionary.
DissidentRage wrote
Reply to comment by elyersio in What's your job, and if your boss knew you were on Raddle would they fire you? by elyersio
Yup.
DissidentRage wrote
Reply to comment by An_Old_Big_Tree in ha by An_Old_Big_Tree
Ahh, okay. I actually couldn't tell that it was a trash bag, which probably didn't help. Need coffee.
DissidentRage wrote
Reply to comment by dsabiboibbobi in The Rojava Revolution is a breach in the capitalist system by retiredshared5
It is progress. They shouldn't settle for it being capitalist, but it's still progress.
DissidentRage wrote
I'm not self-doxxing.
DissidentRage wrote
Reply to ha by An_Old_Big_Tree
Huh?
DissidentRage wrote
Reply to Witnesses: Ashes Of Woman Who Died In Police Custody Thrown At LAPD Chief Charlie Beck by Catsforfun
10/10 - I'm putting this into my will.
DissidentRage wrote
I think anyone who takes figures and actions out of the Black Book of Communism at face value isn't any stripe of honest leftist, and throwing the baby out with the bathwater isn't useful. They've all done bad shit, but it doesn't invalidate everything they've done. It's just demonstrates that having a central figure lead the revolution is a bad idea.
DissidentRage wrote
Reply to comment by ziq in cheeky by An_Old_Big_Tree
Sounds like you're describing socdems, in which case I'd agree.
DissidentRage wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted1196 in Who owns this server now? Is it still Ziq? by elyersio
Okay. Whatever. In lieu of a full block feature I'm not responding to your posts.