ComradeTrump

ComradeTrump wrote

firstly this is blatant ableism, should go without saying. the above conclusion is derived from the fact that most posts are written by few very active posters who get labeled insane.

my main point being that poster here is telling about something completely diferent, as the obvious conclusion is that most of whats written is written by those who write the most, this is even acknowledged by the poster.

But there's more, because not all the users who post do so with the same frequency. The 1% rule is of course just another way of saying that the distribution of contributions follows a Power Law Distribution, which means that the level of inequality gets more drastic as you look at smaller subsets of users.

the implication is that the few 'bad' people is whats wrong with internet and not any sort of flaw in the ideology which may or may not be propagated by those in power

3

ComradeTrump wrote

Reply to comment by philomath in Voat.co is finished by Hopium

did you just hit us with the "they're a different thing fascists call themselves"? surely you must know what is actually meant by "heritage and homeland". to go around parroting these ideals as innocent is either ignorance or straight up lying.

2

ComradeTrump wrote

Reply to by !deleted20335

is this an enlightened centrist post. do they really mean to say that as you go more towards the left you get back to tyranny. is this a horseshoe?

3

ComradeTrump wrote

But what they fail to factor into their shallow and short-sighted idealistic analysis are a myriad of real life material conditions and situations which not only complicate, but render their positions untenable, such as those faced by pregnant women in the context of patriarchy

they proceed not to mention what these supposed conditions and situations are; this is pure concern trolling. then they continue to rant about how perfectly legitimate criticism on china is hurting the discourse amongst leftists

1