CircleA
CircleA wrote
Reply to comment by ewk in META: Reddit v. Raddle.... Fight! by ewk
https://raddle.me/f/zenarchism/143119/not-zen-by-ewk
This post proves they're religious fact-haters who are scared of books.
CircleA wrote
Reply to How Would U Feel if Propaganda of the Deed Type Stuff Started to get Popular but the Anarchist Doing it Allow for a Decent Amount of Random People Dying from Bullets, Burning to Death or Other Such Fates? If the A poor persons House Blew up with a poor and 20 Visiting Children How Would u Feel? by lettuceLeafer
The secret service has to investigate any and all talk of killing the big man. I'd edit the title if I were you.
CircleA wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted34530 in Just joined by lunasyndaclist
so many new people wow.
It's a christmas miracle!
And tomorrow the snow will melt and they with it and we'll realize they were all magical snow elves.
CircleA wrote
Reply to comment by IBurnMuney in Humans will be extinct in 100 years says eminent scientist by ziq
So what happened on Easter Island?
CircleA wrote
Reply to comment by anarchyfrog in Do you think someone who eats farmed meat when they have the ability to be vegan is being oppressive? by anarchyfrog
Lol that red fash site is so fucked
CircleA wrote
CircleA wrote
Reply to comment by mofongo in Everything I don't like is jewish by DisposableAccount
posting that bob black piece in feminism should probably be acted on too
CircleA wrote
Reply to comment by subrosa in Anarchists Against Democracy: In Their Own Words [Updated with Kropotkin & Spooner] by ziq
Best way is to look at the anlib subs and see who they cite while they defend democracy
https://old.reddit.com/r/chomsky/comments/q9byq3/anarchists_against_democracy_in_their_own_words/
Of course, the link on r/LeftWithoutEdge was deleted immediately because being an anarchist is very edgy I suppose.
CircleA wrote
Tried to link to the list on anarchy101 where it's most needed, but as usual they deleted it because of their anti raddle bias. Really sick of the mods on that sub.
CircleA OP wrote
Reply to comment by zoom_zip in What's your ultimate music playlist? by CircleA
Thanks for making an effort.
CircleA OP wrote
Reply to comment by lettuceLeafer in PSA: Settlers giving reparations to the people they've colonized - including returning their land - is not an ethnostate by CircleA
I'm not a settler, the opposite in fact. You, on the other hand are suffering from an acute case of highly contagious settleritis.
CircleA OP wrote
Reply to comment by lettuceLeafer in PSA: Settlers giving reparations to the people they've colonized - including returning their land - is not an ethnostate by CircleA
If u have no money it will be extremely useless to give people land
Yeah land is so useless to people who have none because it's been stolen from them as part of an ongoing genocide.
settlers gonna settler
CircleA OP wrote
Reply to comment by lettuceLeafer in PSA: Settlers giving reparations to the people they've colonized - including returning their land - is not an ethnostate by CircleA
Imagine saying settlers can't give back land to their victims because 1. the victims are 'extremely poor indigenous people' who won't know what to do with it and 2. the victims are 'tobacco and gambling tycoons' who will exploit the settlers by becoming their landlords.
CircleA OP wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by lettuceLeafer in PSA: Settlers giving reparations to the people they've colonized - including returning their land - is not an ethnostate by CircleA
calls indigenous people 'tabacco and gambling tycoons' and insinuates they want to exploit the poor innocent white settlers who took their land at gunpoint and calls me racist
CircleA OP wrote
Reply to comment by lettuceLeafer in PSA: Settlers giving reparations to the people they've colonized - including returning their land - is not an ethnostate by CircleA
Are you a white settler?
CircleA OP wrote
Reply to comment by lettuceLeafer in PSA: Settlers giving reparations to the people they've colonized - including returning their land - is not an ethnostate by CircleA
Who said anything about infertile deforested farmland? Give them their own land back. all the state-owned land at the very least, plus land being held by speculators / developers / landlords.
CircleA OP wrote
Reply to comment by lettuceLeafer in PSA: Settlers giving reparations to the people they've colonized - including returning their land - is not an ethnostate by CircleA
for you maybe
CircleA wrote
Reply to Weird things you Belived as kids. by Exlurker
Can you replace the word 'crazy' with 'weird' or a similar non ableist word? Thank you.
CircleA OP wrote
Reply to comment by existential1 in Anarcho-settlers on why reparations = ethnostates by CircleA
A lot more in the mod log:
You are straight up racist. I did not choose to be born the color that I am, nor could I have stopped my ancestors from doing heinous shit.
You're basically calling me evil for doing nothing more than surviving. It's not helpful. It solves nothing.
And the whole "Indigenous peoples are land stewards" is so historically and currently off base, I am not sure you have ever actually spoken to any.
...
I downvoted you because you're acting far more racist than anyone here, and then crying foul because you think your opinions are impervious to criticism because of your race.
...
I understand fully what "whiteness" means.
But in the context of the conversation we're having, "white people should not be able to own land" cannot mean anything other than "throw white people off their land" by their skin color, pragmatically.
(and how the fuck is that not a gross embodiment of authoritarianism is beyond me- you gonna force me out of my house at gunpoint? By who's authority?)
I'd love to see how you or anyone else thinks "denying white ownership" plays out.
...
Absolutely shocking that a person named BlackApocalypse and whining about racist is the most racist person in a sub.
...
maybe leftists/anarchists can stop clubbing each over the head with the color of their skin and their ideological purity and all this other pure bullshit we're going on about?
...
Nah fuck off mate. You don’t get to segregate land and call yourself an anarchist LMAO
...
Bro you don’t give a fuck about indigenous people, you’ve just got a hate boner for white people because you can’t fathom someone else to take your anger out on.
...
Okay, then tell me exactly what you mean by landback, and tell me if that property belongs to anyone. If you by accident say that the property is given to someone or belongs to someone, you are admitting to be a non-anarchist.
...
I don't think you understand just how racist the person it, and the fact that their posts are tremendously unpopular on this sub because the person is a complete troll. But they snuck in one post with 500 upvotes, but ousted themselves in the comment section immediately. They've been called an alt-right troll about a dozen times in their posts.
It isn't reverse racism, it's just racism. And everyone who has interacted with that person in the comment section knows it. They literally believe in private property.
...
Step back and look at the thing you just said. "And SO WHAT if someone is trying to boot you out of your home for the sins of your fathers..." Wow, it's so weird that someone would have a visceral reaction to being dehumanized, unfuckinbelievable.
The "even if they are" is you just handwaving away the brutality because "someone else has it worse." And you only do that because my skin is pale.
"so what if someone was trying to kick you out of your home"
Repeat that in a mirror until you realize how disgusting it is to say that to anyone
...
Why should I read a book (about whiteness) that makes me racist? Seems quite counter-active to my stance being anti-racist.
Especially when OP spouse opionions like the "gentle savage that lives in harmony with nature" and that all "oppressed people are on my side".
No, that's not reality.
And if you can't debate the topic but refers to a book you've lost me. Besides, when calling me a liberal you are not building my interest you are doing the opposite you fucking fascist.
...
it boils down to "POC doing X good, white people doing X bad"
It's racist. Both ideologically and pragmatically racist.
...
The fuck difference does that make to my situation?
Let's cut to the chase- you're driving towards "you should live in "your own" country" And that's fucking hilarious in a goddamn Anarchist forum.
I'm out. Go back to defending literal ethnonationalism and clubbing other leftists over the head with their skin color, real productive shit. (also fuck you and your immediate downvotes. I can do it too, see?)
...
What right have I? The right to demand democracy. The right to say that a community, regardless of sordid things done by their ancestors, ought be free to govern itself. Your proposal amounts to ethnic cleansing--or else how do you propose that a community of, say, Newfoundland fishermen who have lived on the same north Atlantic rock for four hundred years suddenly be dissolved.
...
Op wants segregation instead of solving racial issues based on there post history . Why is this allowed on this sub.
...
Seems you have some real racist oppinions yourself you need to sort out. "White ownership is exploitation", "Indigenous are land stewards" Yeah, uhm, no. Sort out your own racism.
...
Sound a lot like what neo cons say
...
No your downvoted cause you have a shit and racist argument.
...
Op has some interesting opinions regarding white people and land ownership for an anarchist
...
"White people shouldn't be able to own land" ...is fucking racist. End of. OP is quite clearly an ethnonationalist
...
Looked through their history and can confirm what you said. It feels absurd to say, but OP seems to be reverse racist. Anti racism isn't just anti white people. White people benefit the most from racism, but racism won't be solved by hating white people.
...
So their definition of "racism" might be stretched a bit far then? I'm all for antiracism but it seems a very vague complaint by OP to say "black and indigenous people aren't welcome here" while simultaneously having the shittest takes possible in this very thread.
...
Op litteraly said white ppl shouldn’t be able to own land I think we already found the racist.
...
This op is rly racist Imagine saying white ppl shouldn’t own land but bipoc should when what matters most is democratically managing land regardless of race.
...
I don't actively participate in this community so I don't really know about the racism you are talking about, but your post history only makes me feel like you are a black supremacist.
Again I don't know about the racism that you have experienced but if I were American (for context: I am greek) I would definitely feel discriminated against if I were told by you that I shouldn't be able to own land.
...
You are racist. Its that simple. Promoting Capitalist Agendas such as Multiculturalism and Race divides. Quite American though. Noticed that for Americans Is quite hard to think out of race or identities boundaries.
...
Looking at your post history OP and I believe if you don't wanna be seen as black supremacist maybe you should stop making arguments as one
CircleA wrote
Reply to comment by Alphazero in Update on the anarchist publication I was trying to submit my anti-work essay to by ziq
https://raddle.me/f/Anarchism/134806/entry-points-politics
Read this. Anarchy is beyond politics.