AnarchoDoom

AnarchoDoom wrote (edited )

Reply to comment by Tequilx_Wolf in Pure Black by Tequilx_Wolf

How can individuals not exist... while social categories would? Or perhaps the very notion of "individual" is equally a liberal political concept that deserves to be replaced by a deeper notion (the ego, or the Unique). Still, the existence of human individuals is undeniable.

I only seen hardcore leftists deny the existence of the individual, yet it's also the same people using ID categories as political platforms. Which is logical with their of human subjects as group/mass identities, therefore denying the very life of individuals who aren't relating with any of those.

The fact of being made to exist through representation politics doesn't make an identity existing, yet only "existent". Aren't pure black anarchists supposed to be "at daggers drawn" with the latter?

4

AnarchoDoom wrote (edited )

Reply to Pure Black by Tequilx_Wolf

What would be a "pure black" stance on ID politics, tho? As I see an unworkable paradox in here.

4

AnarchoDoom wrote (edited )

Reply to comment by Barut in by !deleted32466

So embarrassing. If only they had black/red flags, I wouldn't be surprised, but these preachers in uniform carrying black flags is an insult.

What's left for the rest of us... invisible flags? :0)

2