AeroFalcon
AeroFalcon OP wrote
Reply to comment by ziq in Why not allow all kinds of communes? by AeroFalcon
I mean, why am I not an anarchist?
What do you want me to do instead?
Should I hate what consenting adults are doing?
What is wrong with me?
Fi-x, me, co-mman-der
AeroFalcon OP wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted8205 in Why not allow all kinds of communes? by AeroFalcon
Why would capitalists leave you alone?
Without governments doing their bs, war will be very (too) expensive. Like seriously, why would they hire a lot of people just to attack a random small anarchist communes?
Secondly, they can't oppress us, because they can't access our thoughts and they don't know who is & who isn't an anarchist. Do you really think that they will risk killing their capitalists mates/workers?
We already have the internet and it's just a great tool for alt-right garbage.
No, It's a great tool, for things like raddle and illegal content. Without the internet, I don't think that It would have been possible 4 me to learn about anarchism.
Why only government and public schools? what about corporation and private/charter schools? I wonder what is "bad parenting" for you.
Bad parenting -> Sending your children to school instead of homeschooling them. Teaching your children to respect authority/hierarchy...etc
AeroFalcon OP wrote
Reply to comment by ziq in Why not allow all kinds of communes? by AeroFalcon
Oh I forgot 2 answer your question.
I discovered it a few months ago, thanks to /f/shoplifting
AeroFalcon OP wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted1196 in Why not allow all kinds of communes? by AeroFalcon
You're acting like anarchists can't grow (from a material pov) and can't innovate...
AeroFalcon wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by !deleted1196 in by !deleted8445
I don't blame them, I tell the "truth"
Do you really think that with perfect intelligence/awareness/technique, nothing can save them ?
AeroFalcon OP wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted1196 in Why not allow all kinds of communes? by AeroFalcon
It's an indoctrination problem, not a strength problem.
If everyone had social/class awareness, the government would never be able to beat them.
Do u really think that the government can beat billion of people ? Gimme a break...
AeroFalcon OP wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted8205 in Why not allow all kinds of communes? by AeroFalcon
Easy. Thanks to internet more & more people will know the truth and more & more people become strong enough to fight back/join anarchist communes.
So yeah, internet counter their propaganda.
But capitalism isn't the only problem the government and public schools too. Bad parenting is also a problem...
Just think about it, how can it does?
Capitalist live in their communes, we live in our communes -> end of story
AeroFalcon OP wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted1196 in Why not allow all kinds of communes? by AeroFalcon
I really don't get it.
Cuz what happened b4 can't happen in the future bcuz :
I mean today we already have the weapons, defense, internet...etc It's unlikely that capitalists will succeed in invading ancom communes.
There are already a few ancom communes nowadays & not a lot of them have been invaded
And a lot of people will be aware that violence/invading is a dick move (meanwhile in the past, nobody really respected people/life)
AeroFalcon OP wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted1196 in Why not allow all kinds of communes? by AeroFalcon
Yea ofc It will always be wrong for a rapist to rape people. But unfortunately, they still exist & we have to find ways to defend ourselves...
AeroFalcon OP wrote
Reply to comment by Majrelende in Why not allow all kinds of communes? by AeroFalcon
Yea.
Egalitarianism doesn't mean that technological progress is forbidden
AeroFalcon OP wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted1196 in Why not allow all kinds of communes? by AeroFalcon
Technological progress is not against anarchism
AeroFalcon OP wrote
Reply to comment by rot in Why not allow all kinds of communes? by AeroFalcon
Companies/corporations are governments...
Zapatista is a government (that is abusing a bit their power with a drug war, for example), but they aren't that bad.
I mean ok actually there is no good government. But how can I know in the future?
AeroFalcon OP wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted1196 in Why not allow all kinds of communes? by AeroFalcon
No, I am not victim blamin' at all (in fact I hate this).
But from an analysis/tactical point of view, that was the problem...
AeroFalcon OP wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted1196 in Why not allow all kinds of communes? by AeroFalcon
No, colonialism is a dick move.
What I wanted to say is that the fact that they didn't have enough weapons/technology when their opponents were asshole was the problem.
AeroFalcon OP wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted1196 in Why not allow all kinds of communes? by AeroFalcon
I mean today we already have the weapons, defense, internet...etc It's unlikely that capitalists will succeed in invading ancom communes.
There are already a few ancom communes nowadays & not a lot of them have been invaded
AeroFalcon wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted1196 in by !deleted8445
I don't get what you are saying. It's true that If all palestinians were anarchists, this conflict wouldn't have gone this way.
Please explain me
AeroFalcon wrote
Reply to comment by heckthepolice2 in by !deleted8445
I mean If all palestinians were anarchists, this conflict would have ended a long time ago...
AeroFalcon OP wrote
Reply to comment by Majrelende in Why not allow all kinds of communes? by AeroFalcon
The main problem wasn't capitalists/inequality, It was that hunter gatherers, from an efficient pov aren't that efficient.
With permaculture, u can grow much more things & there is much more food for every1 than in hunter-gatherer lifestyles.
People just left the hunter gatherers lifestyle and wanted to join the agriculture/wage job lifestyle, sadly...
The hunter gatherer weren't that advanced from a technological pov because of their inefficiency & some assholes decided to invade at this moment... Grr...
AeroFalcon OP wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted1196 in Why not allow all kinds of communes? by AeroFalcon
Go ask 'em If It is immoral to smash stores, banks windows in a protest and they'll all say -> "No, they are thugs, It is immoral !"
Ask 'em If It is moral to loot, If u are sure to not be caught & they'll all tell u "no".
AeroFalcon OP wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted1196 in Why not allow all kinds of communes? by AeroFalcon
I mean u don't support the choice to not be free, for people who want it?
AeroFalcon OP wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted1196 in Why not allow all kinds of communes? by AeroFalcon
Yea, go ask people If It's ok to steal from big corporations & they'll all say "no".
Nobody likes this
btw
AeroFalcon OP wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted1196 in Why not allow all kinds of communes? by AeroFalcon
I mean If there are anarchist communes, why would you stay in capitalist communes If you hate them?
AeroFalcon OP wrote
Reply to comment by ziq in Why not allow all kinds of communes? by AeroFalcon
It is not voluntary If there aren't enough anarchist communes. Once there are enough I don't see any problem...
AeroFalcon OP wrote
Reply to comment by ziq in Why not allow all kinds of communes? by AeroFalcon
How can they exploit humans for their labor
Yea that's why capitalism is bad. Wage jobs r bullshit. Work or starve is bullshit. But what If some people like it? What If some people like this danger? Why are there so many pro-capitalist people in the world then?
You can't exploit land? I mean don't see anything wrong with using land, right? As long as you don't pollute...
AeroFalcon wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted7213 in by !deleted8445
No, palestinians should be statists, this will solve all their problems :s !
Same thing with north koreans people