107a
107a wrote
107a OP wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by Basil in Despite the claim otherwise, this is indeed electoralism (and blatant electioneering) by 107a
The act of voting isn't the issue, it's making statements that voting for a political party "has a tremendous impact intersectionally" and is "the difference between life and death". This is a liberal posing as an anarchist to campaign for a neoliberal, imperialist politician.
I checked their post history and they only had a couple other comments on anarchist subs. And one of the comments was again shaming people to vote dem.
107a OP wrote
Reply to comment by zephyr in Despite the claim otherwise, this is indeed electoralism (and blatant electioneering) by 107a
No it isn't. The moment any anarchist puts their faith in the state, they've stopped being an anarchist. State socialists aren't anarchists.
107a OP wrote
Reply to Despite the claim otherwise, this is indeed electoralism (and blatant electioneering) by 107a
Just don't want liberals to shame everyone into moving the goalposts to redefine electoralism so they can continue turning every anarchist space into r/vote_blue_no_matter_who.
107a OP wrote
Reply to comment by 107a in r/CA has been completely hijacked by astroturfing liberals by 107a
Can't even reply to someone who replied to me in agreement because the person above me in the chain blocked me.
107a OP wrote
Reply to comment by CircleA in r/CA has been completely hijacked by astroturfing liberals by 107a
Yeah, we can't even downvote their posts or their comments. They've effectively blocked all criticism of their liberalism. Marxists have been doing it on anarchist subs too.
107a OP wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by subrosa in r/CA has been completely hijacked by astroturfing liberals by 107a
They blocked me before I could say
You would opt for empty platitudes from neoliberal politicians over direct action, shitlib.
Just frustrating how many people block me before i can reply lately. Literally everyone I respond to now. Giving leftists a personal censorship button was a disaster. I even got blocked the other day for linking someone to an audiobook they requested.
107a OP wrote (edited )
A cautionary tale about trusting 'anarchists' who defend and promote authoritarian governments.
107a wrote
Reply to comment by TheNerdyAnarchist in -Wait, it's Already Friday? : The Free Talk Thread by monday
It's odd because their own sub barely gets any comments but they all have a ton to say on r/@
107a OP wrote
Reply to comment by TheNerdyAnarchist in People live in Rojava so you can't speak critically about their government by 107a
107a OP wrote
Reply to comment by RanDomino in People live in Rojava so you can't speak critically about their government by 107a
I don't support Turkey. How do you, as a leftist, reconcile Rojava's government being homophobic and transphobic? You never see Western transphobic leftists get accolades, but if they're brown TERFs we need to shut up and pay fealty? I don't get it.
107a OP wrote
How long do I have to wait before I can stop pretending Apoism is amazing fantastic?
107a wrote
Reply to comment by RanDomino in r/anarchism's vanguard at work ensuring their sub remain pro-government (part 2) by anarchyfrog
Assadist fascism
Since the PKK is now openly aligned with Assad, does that mean you're calling Rojava fascist?
107a OP wrote
Reply to Anyone else sick of crypto-Marxist entryists putting out propaganda to counter anarchist positions, and seeing "anarchists" lap it up? by 107a
Fuck Zoe Baker, Vaush, Noncompete, Anark.
In fact fuck every youtube fake anarchist.
107a wrote
Reply to Cult of personality by Potkea
107a OP wrote
Reply to It's time we stopped entertaining this disinformation from demcons appropriating anarchy for entryism by 107a
Dual power, elections, councils, direct democracy and anarcho-government.
The absolute state of American ancoms.
107a wrote
Reply to apparently this user was banned from r/anarchism for this post and then more people in the comments mentioned they were banned for making vegan posts by zoom_zip
The reason is because of this carnist:
https://old.reddit.com/user/pwdpwdispassword
Made 2 threads in r/metanarchism demanding the vegans be banned.
107a wrote
Reply to comment by foggymorn in by !deleted34351
They really censored me for calling him a wife beater?
107a wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by ziq in George Carlin was a great anarchist by ziq
Will do.
I haven't got a Raddle account, but unfortunately those are really all the details I know. Jason McQuinn and I met in 2016 in Oakland, California where he lives. He and I had met a few times before at an annual conference that typically occurred after the San Francisco Bay Area Anarchist Book Fair. He has been editor since (I believe) the 1980's. We were talking and we got into the discussion about famous anarchists and people who subscribed to Anarchy. I asked McQuinn if they ever corresponded or anything, but he said no, they just mailed him the magazine like any other subscriber. He never mentioned getting any letters from Carlin or anything.
107a wrote
Reply to comment by BatmanEatingA55 in Another new mind to add to the pile! :D by BatmanEatingA55
are you still under her right now?
107a wrote
Welcome to the raddllution. Here's a meme so it's not off topic:
107a wrote
Why not just use this site since it has a built in anarchist audience and image uploads?
107a wrote
Reply to comment by Bezotcovschina in Friday Free Talk by emoticons
Congratulations.
107a wrote
Reply to It's almost Pavlovian, the way Marxists respond to mentions of anarchist theory... by tuesday
Kinda true, but only because anarchist theory isn't written so it can only be understood by higher members of the cult