But the reason I oppose reparations, and often hear from others, is that it is mediated through the state and capital. As any reparations in terms of land or wealth upholds commodification. As well reparations is often seen, and I agree, as reformist.

This is a dogmatic view of things. The reason why armed struggle exists is because the state won't give back the things they stole from other people without giving a fight. If the state, somehow, becomes generous and gives back the land without any bloodshed, why should we turn it down?

Tactics needs to be diversified. Armed struggle and peaceful, legal struggle should go hand-in-hand, not alone. Otherwise, the struggle would surely go down in defeat.