Recent comments in /f/meta
emma wrote (edited )
Reply to Raddle loads images from clearnet CDN instead of onion when using onion domain by Rocket_Gecko
yeah. postmill only has one global setting for which domain to serve images from, and i'm too lazy to fix this.
also the onion site gets an incredibe amount of abuse at times, and offloading image traffic to cloudflare would go a long way toward solving it.
edit: to clarify, it used to be that UPLOAD_ROOT=/
, which made images load relative to the domain you were visiting from. now it's UPLOAD_ROOT=https://uploads-cdn.raddle.me/
, so that's where images will load from on both the clearnet and onion sites.
ROBUXYYYYYYYYYY wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted53421 in Cloudflare stats by ziq
Mods, wipe them clean off the face of the earth, thank you
Lettuce wrote
Reply to comment by Radriendil in Can we get a global ban on /u/POUND_MY_ANGUS for sexually harrassing users. [Action taken] by asterism
they are banned on /f/askraddle nothing else
Radriendil wrote
Reply to comment by Lettuce in Can we get a global ban on /u/POUND_MY_ANGUS for sexually harrassing users. [Action taken] by asterism
Is this asshole actually banned? I replied to them before I saw this and they're still here.
Radriendil wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted53421 in Cloudflare stats by ziq
Throwing your drink in someone's face isn't funny, and shouting "it's just a prank, bro!" afterwards doesn't make it a joke.
Lettuce wrote
Reply to Can we get a global ban on /u/POUND_MY_ANGUS for sexually harrassing users. [Action taken] by asterism
sounds good I've allready given them a forum ban so no real need for a warning
ruminator wrote (edited )
Reply to Can we get a global ban on /u/POUND_MY_ANGUS for sexually harrassing users. [Action taken] by asterism
Someone is spamming my inbox too, but using a different account. I can’t tell if someone is genuinely having a breakdown, trying to play a trick on me, or something else. Also not sure if that issue is related to this one.
EmberGrove wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted53421 in Cloudflare stats by ziq
I said silence
EmberGrove wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted53421 in Cloudflare stats by ziq
No I dont catch I am a top. bottoms dont throw, they only catch and you are one of them based on your name.
ROBUXYYYYYYYYYY wrote
Reply to comment by EmberGrove in Cloudflare stats by ziq
It's the feds
Enheduanna wrote
Reply to comment by topa in Cloudflare stats by ziq
"Unique visitor" isn't a great term for the statistic nowadays, especially for longer term calculations. Cloudflare calculates it from IP address, so a VPN with a dozen endpoints could send traffic from a hundred users, but only count as 12, or it could send traffic froom one user, and over a month use all endpoints and still count as 12. Many ISPs nowadays give short IPv4 leases, so the same user can end up getting a new IP address every day, and look like multiple dozens of unique users within the same timespan. With TOR you get the same repeated users showing up with a different IP address each visit, so that also increases the number.
I'm guessing there isn't such a huge influx of unique visitors, and it is just the same users appearing with multiple IPs.
EmberGrove wrote
Reply to Cloudflare stats by ziq
Huh its more popular then I thought. Maybe there is a lot of lurkers?
papercut wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted53421 in Cloudflare stats by ziq
Jokes usually involve an element of humor.
Being loud and obnoxious is not it.
topa wrote
Reply to Cloudflare stats by ziq
I wonder what it means that over 100 000 unique visitors come to the site. I wonder if they just google search something and then one of raddle pages is near the top and they click it, or what.
And even more than unique visitors, it's repeat visitors that seem to me to be an interesting group. Is that what the "Total Requests" value roughly reflects relative to the "unique visitors"?
anoonymous wrote
Reply to comment by anoonymous in Thanks to whoever sent me that big donation on Patreon by ziq
attention to details
grub OP wrote
Reply to comment by Exlurker in mods on a power trip by grub
oh no worries, /gen idc really ^•^ /sin
onesock is alright c: i enjoy discussion, even if what i say isn't "valid" or "real" or whatever to other discusser, at least other people can see it and think a lil /lighthearted
u are kind /sin
lilly OP wrote
Reply to comment by ziq in Cannot access Raddle over VPN by lilly
Ok, thanks for the quick reply
ziq admin wrote
Reply to Cannot access Raddle over VPN by lilly
Hi, several VPNs were recently blocked at the server level because someone who got banned was using them to attack the site in retaliation. We're currently in the process of moving to a new dedicated server, and the VPN blocks may no longer be necessary when that happens. I'm sorry for the inconvenience.
ziq OP admin wrote
Reply to "Defining Our Terms" has been updated by ziq
added
These are just guidelines to help you engage with your fellow Raddlers with empathy and compassion, this page shouldn't be taken as a code of laws. We trust our moderators to use their best judgement when determining if something is oppressive enough that it ought to be removed from a forum. They don't need to be spoon-fed exact prescriptions for every potentiality.
Exlurker wrote
Reply to mods on a power trip by grub
Don't let OneSock pull you down, the internet would be a better place if more of it's users were like you.
Exlurker wrote
Reply to comment by OneSock in mods on a power trip by grub
Why must you try to crush Grub's optimism like this?
itsalways1312somewhere wrote
Reply to comment by ziq in "Defining Our Terms" has been updated by ziq
Yeah, I predict this will absolutely lead to more lawyering bs, or at the very least won't decrease the number of posts and debates about this stuff. I think the post that made you add this already was lawyering bs of someone who doesn't come across to me as confused, but rather as willfully ignorant for the purpose of making you add this.
As they say themselves, they have been given multiple explanations, by multiple people, and yet they keep repeating the same lines that have explicitly been replied to & claiming they are confused. Either this is, as I believe, bs or adding yet another explanation to the wiki ain't gonna help.
Either they really want you to add a word list so that then someone can link that tumblr post about word lists again, or they're trying to make you create loopholes, because as they said, they continue to believe that they can use these words without it being ableist.
I will admit that this is not a charitable interpretation and that my opinion of them is also coloured by them assuming I'm neurotypical because I disagree with them. The accusation that mods are neurotypical or the rules were made by neurotypicals is brought up every time this discourse pops up and I'm sick of it and I think they should know better.
ziq OP wrote
Reply to comment by kore in "Defining Our Terms" has been updated by ziq
if you want
kore wrote
Reply to comment by ziq in "Defining Our Terms" has been updated by ziq
Do you think it would be useful to e.g. add a link to https://raddle.me/f/Whiteness under the 'white supremacy' section or is it redundant
pandaqwanda OP wrote
Reply to [WHITELIST] i would like to be whitelisted [added] by pandaqwanda
whitelisted now, thanks