Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] wrote

Reply to comment by ziq in by !deleted13453

−4

ziq wrote

But I linked to the context. She was breaking the ToS no matter which side of the argument you take.

3

[deleted] wrote

−1

ziq wrote

It wasn't a question. The question was between demodding and banning.

3

GaldraChevaliere wrote

You yourself condoned it before, hon. I'm allowed to use the means at my disposal to deal with transphobes and homophobes where you won't.

−3

ziq wrote

Point is you're being a hypocrite for accusing me of being too lenient with other people when I let you walk all over me because I like you.

2

GaldraChevaliere wrote

You have a weird fucking way of showing it, my darling. Quit playing the victim. Your own position has historically been that it's permissible to be aggressive towards fash and their enablers. If actively looking after transfems on the board and responding aggressively to people being hideous towards trans women and others enabling them is hypocritical, what's your behavior?

0

[deleted] wrote

3

GaldraChevaliere wrote

Moral weakness and spinelessness are a thing, champ. If I can deal with my own disabilities without using them as a weak gotcha argument, they're held to the same. Not to mention the actual context upthread is a user with a tankie post history co-opting the very real issue of corrective rape for a petty neo-identity that doesn't actually face signficant threat from it. If youe strongest argument is "we could be mistaken for queers!", you're not queer.

−5