He's skirted the ToS too many times, including a rape joke, multiple instances of lowkey transphobia, and endless attacks on other users including myself and multiple successful attempts to manufacture site-wide drama that puts cointelpro to shame. So I don't trust him with the keys to that forum. Not even sure how he got modded there.
He still mods 3 other forums that I don't care about tho.
Any objections?
Support~
you live on a farm? That's awesome, ziq, now I have a much greater context for our earlier discussion on food forests & rewilding. I wasn't really aware of how you are approaching your praxis, but i genuinely think that's really cool that you have a connection to a specific piece of land, and are committed to it
support
I don't mind the demod too much, but sorry, why are you accusing me of "lowkey transphobia?" when did this happen?
it wasnt intended to be a rape joke though because the "rape" part wasnt the punchline. The joke was about you calling me a cuck. Thats why I changed it once someone pointed out that it was rapey
-_-
i am a cuck, please stop kinkshaming me for it, you anti-cuck bigot.
Idk, you seem pretty hateful of cucks yourself
im a bootlicker now?
There are liberals who don't lick boots..?
Citation pls.
Youre gonna have to point out how im a "liberal" and a bootlicker if youre gonna make the accusations, the burdens on you
How bout the way you identity hop the moment someone calls out your abuse?
https://raddle.me/f/meta/63464/comment/103020
Trying to peer pressure queer people into letting straight people into their spaces.
https://raddle.me/f/meta/63464/comment/103017
Calls trans woman a 'dick', then says it makes him uncomfortable that said trans woman is "exclusionary" to straight people because they mod f/queer.
https://raddle.me/f/meta/63530/comment/102854
"straight people aren't comfortable with a trans woman marginalizing them"
I could go on if you want. That's just from the first page of your post history on your current account. Let's not even talk about your /u/mouse account saying you have a stake in women's bodies because your gf is a woman.
https://raddle.me/f/lobby/64298/comment/105043
We can add sexual harassment to the list too~. Apparently calling him on his shit is riding his dick, lol.
e: Also on the note of the screenshots, he released those without the consent of at least one user who very much didn't want me to see them. We've since worked out our shit in private, but for someone who cares oh-so-much about the emotional safety of other users, he's pretty happy exposing their private moments to people they don't want to interact with.
Yeah that was a major privacy violation, sharing someone's private messages to try and win an argument.
Mofongo told me to show screenshots, Galdra violated privacy by outing all of the people who PMed. But of course I get blamed for it because theyre two of your bestest fwiends.
fuck this, im out. this website is an absolute trainwreck, cant believe you guys have circlejerked yourselves into thinking this is a viable reddit alternative.
You violate your friend's privacy because some rando on the internet asks you for screens? Sure hope the feds don't ask you to snitch on anarchists you've attached yourself to.
How.
oh boy here we go
as a way of making fun of you, yes
thats what we in the business call a "STREEEEEETCH"
STREEEEETCH
tru
https://raddle.me/f/TrollDissection/53560/u-mouse-is-a-good-example-of-a-concern-troll-even-after
This all good fodder for f/trolldissection. You're incapable of not repeating them same oppressions again and again.
See you on account #4 I guess. Next time come back as a tankie, we never really bought you as an anprim.
Could you not just rope me in with some troll? Point out something I did, not some other asshole
Are you fuckin serious guy?
And don't claim to be NB like you did as /u/curious next time. It's fucked how you keep appropriating identities so you can shit on people and not get banned. You're not marginalized in any way. You couldn't be more priviliged.
If you weren't such a shifty disingeous weasel people might actually tolerate you for a while and you wouldn't have to keep ragequitting like this.
You blame everyone but yourself. How can you have this big a victim complex when you live such an easy life?
easy life
owns an entire fucking farm
doesnt benefit anyone but themself
unemployed
has a vice grip on the balls of an entire website
Okay, [edit: dox removed].
Unemployed? I've been working since I was 9 years old.
Banned for doxxing.
vocal fry literally a cuck lol
worked for years at a shitty job
bought a single acre as their just reward
stays to themselves and reforests that acre
still works because the acre isn't enough to live off of yet
only recently became an admin again because they had to earn the userbase's trust first
see you in 1 month with your next alt lol
I'll probably call it something like u/tapeworm or u/defasher, i hope those arent taken
You failed to protect their privacy, posted their private messages and I easily sussed out who they are because one was a transparent sockpuppet, another was Zog because of the exact same writing patterns, and the third asked you not to disclose shit in the first place and you did it anyway. You didn't even fully obscure their name, the bare minimum you should have been doing.
See you in a month~.
mofongo fuckin told me to
You don't have to do everything I say, or do you?
You could have at least have the decency to not show the one that asked you not to.
I don't know what this is about but I assume you mean aces...
Like, if we have to explain we're not "the default" regarding our sexuality then we're not straight. ( I gave up the fight on calling aces queer here but at least don't invalidate our sexuality please )
Specifically heterosexual ones.
I'm asexual so please don't tell me how to be asexual. You're either homoromantic or not.
heterosexual | asexual
Pick one. You can't do both. It's either sexual attraction to the opposite binary gender or no sexual attraction at all.
I am also asexual and from reading raddle I seem to actually be somewhat in touch in the wider ace community than most of you here so don't tell me and most other aces what being ace is.
Stop erasing Asexuality.
TIL heteroromantic cisgender asexuals aren't real.
And I'm the one erasing asexuality.
Plenty of asexuals get off to exclusively heterosexual imagery; this makes them herero. Whether they have full intercourse or not.
Yeah but they are are heteroromantic, not heterosexual or straight, aces. That's like the whole point of my comments.
Umm, but a huge number of them also don't...
Some do it just to have something in there while their libido is being annoying and there's also a lot who don't masturbate at all. And if they watch pornography they often don't search it out for the same reasons allo people usually do ( for example kinky aces ).
Also most ace people aren't into sex and that favorable 8% likely includes kinky people who use sex as a means to live out the kink. This would suggest that they wouldn't be very likely to watch porn for the people having sex...
And aces also have generally lower libido making them even less likely to masturbate ( and anecdotally aces very often don't watch porn to get off anyway ).
Umm, but a huge number of them also don't...
They were specifically referring to hetero aces though. Demanding they be seen as gay. If you didn't read the backstory then I don't know why you're accusing me of erasing asexuality. They even said that asexuals enjoy sex when it's with the right partner - which I didn't understand at all.
I didn't misspeak when I said 'heterosexual' since they were claiming aces could enjoy sex. That's heterosexual, not merely heteroromantic. And saying that people who enjoy exclusively hetero sex are hetero apparently makes me a bigot somehow according to the users involved. If anything, they're erasing asexuality. If we enjoyed sex, we wouldn't be asexual.
But heterosexual aces aren't a thing... If they were then I wouldn't be arguing with you right now.
They even said that asexuals enjoy sex when it's with the right partner - which I didn't understand at all.
I've explained that here. I used the term non-repulsed which, if you look at the pie chart I had in my previous comment, is only one portion of people that fall under the label asexual, I mention this because it's important to think of asexuality as a spectrum rather than a fixed identity.
I didn't misspeak when I said 'heterosexual' since they were claiming aces could enjoy sex. That's heterosexual, not merely heteroromantic.
Asexual just means a person doesn't experience sexual attraction, that's what sexuality is, doesn't mean they can't have sex. Gay guys can have sex with women too, and the genital stimulation might feel good, but that's about it, there'd be no attraction. Aces that enjoy sex ( those 8% on the pie chart ) still don't feel sexually attracted to their partner though, regardless of romantic attraction ( Which is why they're not heterosexual since for that they'd have to experience attraction to the person they're having sex with ). These people would be called sex-favorable.
Then we have sex-indifferent aces ( this is me and the 27% on the pie chart ). Sex-indifferent aces are usually, as the name implies, indifferent to the idea of sex. They could have sex with their partner if their partner wanted them to but wouldn't welcome such occasion. They could also enjoy genital stimulation but more likely they'll be having sex to please their allosexual partner.
The last biggest category ( 37% on the pie chart ) are sex-repulsed aces. To me you seem sex-repulsed considering your last sentence ( but I obviously can't know that, sorry if I'm mistaken ), which would explain why a person liking genital stimulation and calling themselves asexual doesn't make sense to you ( though sexuality doesn't say anything about what type of sex you should like so they're just as valid aces because they they lack sexual attraction ). Sex-repulsed are usually against most forms sexual contact and sometimes even as far as kissing or cuddling.
This was a quick explanation of the 3 major types of aces. There are obviously also other people on the spectrum like demisexuals that feel sexual attraction only after they've entered a romantic relationship with a person, those who fluctuate between different parts of the ace spectrum, and others that I won't be getting into.
The main takeaway is that sexuality and enjoyment of genital stimulation are unrelated and that most ace people fall in the repulsed or indifferent category but that even those who don't are still valid. Also that fixating on a minority of people you don't believe are "ace enough" hurts the wider ace spectrum.
yeah we know what asexual means we've been having that discussion for the last 2 weeks lol.
asexual people can be asexual and LGBT (romantic only), in which case they should be welcomed in LGBT spaces. Non-LGBT asexuals arent a vulnerable population and should not be welcomed in LGBT spaces. That's all the "debate" was about (before it turned into a shitshow).
And as I said in my first comment in this thread: I'm not arguing about that. My point was to just stop calling asexuals homosexual and/or straight because that's just not what we are. Nothing about if we're queer or not. ( that's an already lost battle here on raddle so why bother )
thelegendarybirdmonster wrote
support