jaidedctrl wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by ziq in F3nd0 is violating the ToS by sexualizing children by ziq
Citation please.
I don't want to look up this up (since I'd end up in the corner of the Internet with a bunch of pedos), but I think it'd be fair and logical to think that there are or have been at least a small handful of cases where it wasn't damaging.
If it's not damaging for a 16 year-old to have sex with a 16 year-old, it doesn't make sense that one of them being 19 would make it much more damaging invariably (even though it is significantly more likely that it would be).
EDIT:
How is that pedophilia tho? 2 people the same age having sex has nothing to do with this.
I was talking about the bit about “sexualizing minors”, not just about the paedophilia.
ziq OP wrote
If it's not damaging for a 16 year-old to have sex with a 16 year-old, it doesn't make sense that one of them being 19 would make it much more damaging invariably
That isn't pedophilia.
jaidedctrl wrote
Legally, it is, in many places. If we're not going by the legal age, I don't know what line we're going by.
ziq OP wrote (edited )
The age of consent (in the US) doesn't = pedophilia. Both these things have specific definitions. A 19 year old with a 16 year old isn't pedophilia just because it violates the US's age of consent. They specifically were defending 'voluntary pedophilia'; a perverse concept, and nothing they said indicated they were talking about teenagers having sex with each other.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments