ziq OP wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by jaidedctrl in F3nd0 is violating the ToS by sexualizing children by ziq
between people their age
How is that pedophilia tho? 2 people the same age having sex has nothing to do with this.
paedophilia (isn't) always damaging. Which is true
Citation please.
crapshoot wrote
Citation please.
I've seen a few people claim this from personal experience, but they're either pedos or CSA apologists so you wouldn't believe them anyhow. I think the important point though is that even IF there are a few edge cases of people coming out of this unharmed, it's still evil to do something to a child that has a 99% chance of damaging them.
Just because the number isn't strictly 100% doesn't negate this fact, and conversely there's no reason to insist the number is 100% to the extent of actually denying survivors' experiences.
jaidedctrl wrote (edited )
Citation please.
I don't want to look up this up (since I'd end up in the corner of the Internet with a bunch of pedos), but I think it'd be fair and logical to think that there are or have been at least a small handful of cases where it wasn't damaging.
If it's not damaging for a 16 year-old to have sex with a 16 year-old, it doesn't make sense that one of them being 19 would make it much more damaging invariably (even though it is significantly more likely that it would be).
EDIT:
How is that pedophilia tho? 2 people the same age having sex has nothing to do with this.
I was talking about the bit about “sexualizing minors”, not just about the paedophilia.
ziq OP wrote
If it's not damaging for a 16 year-old to have sex with a 16 year-old, it doesn't make sense that one of them being 19 would make it much more damaging invariably
That isn't pedophilia.
jaidedctrl wrote
Legally, it is, in many places. If we're not going by the legal age, I don't know what line we're going by.
ziq OP wrote (edited )
The age of consent (in the US) doesn't = pedophilia. Both these things have specific definitions. A 19 year old with a 16 year old isn't pedophilia just because it violates the US's age of consent. They specifically were defending 'voluntary pedophilia'; a perverse concept, and nothing they said indicated they were talking about teenagers having sex with each other.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments