Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

ziq wrote (edited )

ziq and I discussing whether or not issues on Raddle should be decided by a vote

Not what we were talking about... We already decide with votes so that makes not a lick of sense.

You're claiming we can't vote and discuss in the same thread and that everyone's votes in a proposal should be ignored unless the OP uses the word 'motion' or 'vote' in the title.

First thread was:

Can we rename /f/ShitLiberalsSayOrDo back to /f/ShitLiberalsSay?

Second thread was:

I make a motion to rename /f/ShitLiberalsSayOrDo back to /f/ShitLiberalsSay.

No freakin difference. And way more ppl voted in the first one than the 'formal' second one...

If people change their mind during the discussion, they can click edit and change their vote.

Responding to counter proposals in the thread with votes isn't messy, it's always worked just fine. The parent comment is the proposal, the replies are votes.

Votes cast on the OP's proposal are always made as parent comments - so they're easy to count. The votes aren't hidden in deep chains or something. When I was an admin I counted the votes and never had any trouble.

The discussion we have to reach a consensus is infinitely more valuable than the votes anyway. Seperating the two things will only allow brosh to cast votes to protect bigots without having to explain themselves.

OPPOSE this attempt to build a raddle vanguard where only people that know and care about the official lingo / overly complicated procedures can participate.

2