Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

3

md_ wrote

Why is that?

Because in all your posts around the issue of T_W's mediation requests, all you did was to superficially antagonise people through little more than name-calling.

I could be considered as "belonging" to many marginalized groups. I'm not bourgeois, white, straight, or cis and I have a disability.

I really don't see how your personal identities have anything to do with the topic. The quality of an argument is not a function of their identities... and that doesn't even apply here, because you didn't even present an argument, you just spewed buzzwords like " toxic privilege politics" and " totalitarian thought police".

I just happen to consider identity-based politics, "punching up" at fellow proletarians, and call-out-culture, to be counter-revolutionary poison to the left.

You might very well believe that, and if you start expressing those positions without the witch-hunt and the name-calling, I would show more good faith and make an effort to engage and disagree with you.

10

emma wrote (edited )

I really don't see how your personal identities have anything to do with the topic.

Really gets me when loudmouthed anti-identitarians like these (/u/Rum_Rabbit) turn out to be the biggest identitarians of them all.

Edit: clarify who I'm talking about.

1

md_ wrote (edited )

I resisted the urge of explicitly pointing it out, but yes. They actually did every single "liberal" thing they accused others of doing. That's one of the reasons I don't trust them to be sincere in their disagreement/objections, or whatever their name-calling is supposed to be.