Submitted by ziq admin in meta (edited )

They want me to delete all their data and all the themes they made.

In my view, the themes belong to the community as soon as they're donated, so it wouldn't be right for me to delete them without first consulting the community.

So should themes donated to a FOSS site be deleted upon request?

They've also sabotaged some of their themes to display a blank page with no text, but they can easily be rolled back.

12

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

not_AFX_lol wrote

Delete them and then make it very clear from here on out that CSS themes, once contributed, are to be considered communal property and will not be deleted without community consent.

17

WindTalk wrote

As for license, I suggest: Public Domain.

4

boringskip wrote

or BSD, public domain isn't a real license in America, at least

2

WindTalk wrote (edited )

public domain isn't a real license in America

It's very real. http://publicdomainmovies.net
https://www.lifewire.com/find-public-domain-books-online-3481751

4

boringskip wrote

I think that only applies when the copyright expires. In the US, anyone has automatic copyright as soon as they create a work.

4

WindTalk wrote

Why are you arguing a nonsensical point with me? Public Domain is perfectly valid for an author to grant in the USA.

2

red_pepper wrote

I agree with not_AFX_lol - delete them, but make a clear policy on CSS contributions for the future.

5

zombie_berkman wrote

tell them to pound sand until it turns into a diamond

5

leftous wrote (edited )

So they want to retroactively change the license by which they distributed it?

While we technically have no obligation to, I think we should respect their wishes out of courtesy if they are the only one who contributed to their themes. If others contributed or have themes that derive from no_fun's themes, their permission should be sought first.

4

surreal wrote

Delete them, it's not like someone(you) could not copy them and re add them later, they are not under some copyright, are they?

4

bea wrote

Why is it that everywhere I go people have no idea how copyright works.

Yes, they are "under a copyright". Author is an owner of their intelectual property by default and unless they say otherwise, they get to keep those rights.

5

surreal wrote

i have no idea cause copyright is stupid imo. Well this should change in raddle's ToS, everything contributed here should fall under some FOSS license and not the auto-copyright madness.

3

christobal wrote

Was there any documentation saying that themes would be donated to community?

If there were then do whatever you want, if there wasnt then there should be one so that this won't be a problem again. :)

3

jaidedctrl wrote

Just out of curiosity, did they say why they're leaving? They're pretty nice people, from what I remember. :o

3

ziq OP wrote

They didn't, but it's easy to guess.

3

jaidedctrl wrote (edited )

I'm kinda dense, could you spell it out for me...?

EDIT: Scratch that, I just saw the "Goodbye Raddle" thread on /f/lobby, think I get it now

EDIT: Jesus

2

ziq OP wrote

ShiningWing now has the same request.

2