Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

6

________deleted wrote

Bullshit argumentation is bullshit argumentation.

Agreed. So "people who value the individual as much as the collective are racist anti-feminist rightwing kiddies" is bullshit argumentation and should be called out. See?

Words mean things.

Agreed. So maybe don't throw around words like 'reactionary' and 'racist' when the people you're accusing have done literally nothing to warrant those labels?

0

TimmyCatChores wrote

If you speak against child development psychology you do not speak for feminists and civil-rights activist who focus on child-development.

You really need to look at that line of argumentation.

What do you know about child-development as it related to social justice?

Child development is about psychology. If you speak against psychology, you speak against a rational pro-feminist and anti-racist child-development for urban communities.

Racism isn't always conscious. Sometimes it;s just through well meaning incompetence.

Latent racism is real racism. It's not whatever anyone thinks it is.

5

________deleted wrote (edited )

if you speak against child development psychology you do not speak for feminists and civil-rights activist who focus on child-development.

Please quote me doing that because I have no idea what you're talking about.

What do you know about child-development as it related to social justice?

I don't understand why you're asking me this. I know nothing of child development.

Child development is about psychology. If you speak against psychology, you speak against a rational pro-feminist and anti-racist child-development for urban communities.

I don't believe I've ever spoken about psychology on raddle. Very confused.

Racism isn't always conscious. Sometimes it;s just through well meaning incompetence.

Please quote me being unconsciously racist because this is starting to feel like gaslighting.

Latent racism is real racism. It's not whatever anyone thinks it is.

Not sure what that has to do with your attacks on raddle anarchists, especially since a lot of us here are PoC.

0

TimmyCatChores wrote

I was explaining the problem I was having the RadMentalHealth thread. Not you personally. Sorry, I should have made that clear.

0

TimmyCatChores wrote

'Please quote me'

I have one thread in the RadMentalHealth.

I won't post again until I figure out if I can coexist.

Mental health is connected to feminism, civil-rights and community organizing. So my experience in this mental health forum is related to those issues.

These guys are saying what I'm saying, which is across many disciplines, is "Scientism'.

That is basically anti-science, which is completely off-the wall when it comes to working in real life education and social science.

On facebook I needed to separate myself from the anti-science people, who disrupt any community-based feminism and anti-racism.

That's a thing.

4

BlackFlagged wrote (edited )

I won't post again until I figure out if I can coexist.

You can easily coexist by not insulting everyone that has an opinion that differs from your own and accusing them of being bigots for being anarchists.

4

________deleted wrote

Being critical of scientism doesn't make someone anti-science. It makes them anti-scientism.

Dictionary:

Scientism describes (for example) the dogmatic endorsement of scientific methodology and the reduction of all knowledge to only that which is measured or confirmatory.

Science and scientism are 2 wholly different words.