Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

3

ArbitraryHuman wrote (edited )

Well, when he contested it, you promptly banned him.

”If you don't like it you are welcome to leave, or you can try to ruin the place like they currently are and get banned. Ill leave the choice to you”

https://raddle.me/f/armedleft/15747/comment/20252 Those are your words exactly. He mentioned democracy on Raddle in response, and you said:

”Im threatening to ban you because you are shittingbthr place up. So if you want to keep doing that and causing drama go ahead but you are going to get banned”

https://raddle.me/f/armedleft/15747/comment/20258 You basically banned him for contesting the rules, which isn’t exactly the point of letting people express their opinions. If anything, that’s what a bourgie would do.

-2

zombie_berkman wrote

and they werent banned from that. i literally banned them after the meta post for digging up old shit. but hey dont let facts get in your way

3

ArbitraryHuman wrote

My apologies, I did not read the log correctly.

Nonetheless, you did threaten him with a ban for contesting the rules, and whether or not that played a role in your later decision, “bringing up old shit” as you put it, is neither against the rules nor a bannable offense.

-2

zombie_berkman wrote

so i can go and talk shit on maoists in their f's and not get banned?

3

ArbitraryHuman wrote (edited )

That’s a strawman, and you know it. You stated you banned them for “bringing old shit up”—now you’ve decided that it was because of shit-talking [anarchists], which sudo never did in the first place.