Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] wrote (edited )

5

zombie_berkman wrote

actually they did a month ago in a highly upvoted thread. they then waited a month to stir it back up and then get the thread brigaded

−3

ArbitraryHuman wrote (edited )

Well, when he contested it, you promptly banned him.

”If you don't like it you are welcome to leave, or you can try to ruin the place like they currently are and get banned. Ill leave the choice to you”

https://raddle.me/f/armedleft/15747/comment/20252 Those are your words exactly. He mentioned democracy on Raddle in response, and you said:

”Im threatening to ban you because you are shittingbthr place up. So if you want to keep doing that and causing drama go ahead but you are going to get banned”

https://raddle.me/f/armedleft/15747/comment/20258 You basically banned him for contesting the rules, which isn’t exactly the point of letting people express their opinions. If anything, that’s what a bourgie would do.

3

zombie_berkman wrote

and they werent banned from that. i literally banned them after the meta post for digging up old shit. but hey dont let facts get in your way

−2

ArbitraryHuman wrote

My apologies, I did not read the log correctly.

Nonetheless, you did threaten him with a ban for contesting the rules, and whether or not that played a role in your later decision, “bringing up old shit” as you put it, is neither against the rules nor a bannable offense.

3

zombie_berkman wrote

so i can go and talk shit on maoists in their f's and not get banned?

−2

ArbitraryHuman wrote (edited )

That’s a strawman, and you know it. You stated you banned them for “bringing old shit up”—now you’ve decided that it was because of shit-talking [anarchists], which sudo never did in the first place.

3

zombie_berkman wrote

sudo has a long history of being a tankie and an asshole to anarchist. long post coming. this is self defense

−2

DissidentRage wrote

Alternate reading: you waited until a month after a popular decision was made against an action to commit the action anyway, then accuse anyone calling it of brigading based on a specific criterion that ignores the greater context.

2

zombie_berkman wrote

thats a pretty hot take homie. its just weird how the whole issue was dropped for a month and the thread was +14 and now it has been heavily down voted after they brought it back up.

−2