Ban inthedustoftheplanet for harassmentSubmitted by anticlouds in meta
Comments
The submission is locked. You cannot post new comments.
zoom_zip wrote
thank you random throwaway account
i will change my opinion about /u/inthedustofthisplanet based on your link to a post where they recognise a mistake and correct it
what kind of MONSTER holds themselves accountable for their actions and then apologises about it after
kick ‘em out!
mofongo wrote (edited )
Reminder
New accounts cannot vote or comment on meta/ban threads. If you want to say something, use your main account or state who you are/were.
Offenders will have their comments deleted.
lettuceLeafer wrote
Wouldn't just advising people to block and ignore be a less distressing solution than having to do all the emotional labor creating more raddle drama around banning inthedustofthe planet? It seems like a objectively less emotionally rough solution.
anticlouds OP wrote (edited )
No because clouds does psychological damage by building up a cult of personality then using it to split the site into two warring teams of cloudsgang and "transphobes" (who did nothing more than disagree with clouds about something completely unrelated to trans). And then when it's all over, half the site is in ruins with 20+ deleted or banned accounts and then anyone left standing is burned out and too tense to ever feel comfortable sharing anything publicly again. Are you new or something?
lettuceLeafer wrote
Ive been around for a while but I joined a bit after clouds was banned. Trolls trying to fuck shit up is common in raddle and just ignoring them usually is the best solution or counter trolling for fun.
I'm not too concerned about clouds creating a cult of personality. I was one of the only people who tried to be nice to them and they already trashed the relationship so bad that she doesn't want me to speak to her. I don't really have much concern of people joining the side of someone who is just shitty to everyone.
Everytime something like this happens it's a massive trash fire and horrible experience for everyone involved. Almost always worse than ehat would happen if the person being shitty was just ignored.
[deleted] wrote (edited )
lettuceLeafer wrote
Alright didn't know that. That's a fair response then.
[deleted] wrote (edited )
[deleted] wrote
[deleted] wrote (edited )
[deleted] wrote
no_ wrote
The proper method lol, are you an enforcer of bureaucracy's law or something?
anticlouds OP wrote
Clouds makes enemies of anyone that isn't a mindless clouds sycophant. What did you do to incur the clouds wrath?
lettuceLeafer wrote
Just normal raddle disagreement stuff
anticlouds OP wrote
Probably asked them to stop abusing people, that's usually what gets you on the hit list. Either that or you took issue with them making the whole site about their flame wars.
lettuceLeafer wrote
Nah it was something how I thought it was fine for ziq to make snarky comments on posts of someone that upset them and I said that I think it's authoritarian to own living things.
[deleted] wrote
anticlouds OP wrote
How did you convince the admins to ignore your ban evasion? We should have been given the logs of whatever private convos led to you being allowed to return. It affects the whole community.
anticlouds OP wrote
/u/ziq if you banned them last time, why are they allowed to repeat the same exact abuse again?
ziq wrote
Because they're good at what they do.
anticlouds OP wrote
Also using armies of alts to down vote and push people off the site as usual:
/f/Anarchism/133530/-/comment/221363
But trying to frame them as a transphobe for no reason at all is the most toxic crime of all.
mofongo admin wrote
Hi y'all, I'm here!
So your only evidence for this is a conversation that continued after she conceded and deleted the thread? No wrongdoings there.
On a related topic, it appears you created an account referring to another user (which gives you harassment points), created this banned thread and then proceeded to reply to weeks old comments from inthedust. That doesn't fly.