Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

2

Tequila_Wolf wrote

None exists. iirc it was considered but has not been implemented because it would be costly. Hopefully somebody will clarify soon. It'd also potentially be worthwhile to discuss the merits of having one against the cost here.

2

GrimWillow wrote

I'm not sure what the costs might be, but I'm not going to look too many pages deep to check if I'm making a double post. It's also nice to be able to find specific things.

Are the costs based on bandwidth and server process usage from queries?

2

emma admin wrote (edited )

BORN TO DIE

WORLD IS A FUCK

鬼神 Kill Em All 1989

I am trash man

410,757,864,530 DEAD COPS

1

GrimWillow wrote

yeesh. I totally understand opting out. Never knew that search engines demanded so much memory before.

1

emma wrote (edited )

BORN TO DIE

WORLD IS A FUCK

鬼神 Kill Em All 1989

I am trash man

410,757,864,530 DEAD COPS

1

ziq wrote

It's not worth paying for unless the site grows a lot.