An_Old_Big_Tree wrote
None exists. iirc it was considered but has not been implemented because it would be costly. Hopefully somebody will clarify soon. It'd also potentially be worthwhile to discuss the merits of having one against the cost here.
GrimWillow wrote
I'm not sure what the costs might be, but I'm not going to look too many pages deep to check if I'm making a double post. It's also nice to be able to find specific things.
Are the costs based on bandwidth and server process usage from queries?
[deleted] wrote (edited )
GrimWillow wrote
yeesh. I totally understand opting out. Never knew that search engines demanded so much memory before.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments