Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

An_Old_Big_Tree wrote

I don't think it's technically feasible. At least, it would mean having to do some coding.

I don't think that admins consider the votes when they make a decision though. What specifically is your concern?

4

celebratedrecluse OP wrote

certainly I agree that the admins are basically impartial from the votes. however, I think it fosters a negative flame-war environment, to have the votes there, which in turn provides an incentive to troll the forum or otherwise use it disingenously. I was thinking, how can we best remove this incentive, so my idea was just a brainstorm.

2

ziq wrote

I think tosbreaches should be closed down because it's become just as toxic as f/meta was before. People feel completely entitled to our labor and if we say no they abuse us.

3

mofongo wrote

That's the point of the sub, a hard view at rules broken and only we, admin, decide the proper course of action. From the sidebar:

Low-effort, non-constructive, or otherwise troublesome posts may be locked or deleted. The post is not a vote.

Trivially weaponizing the ToS so you can poke at your enemies is not looked upon as good faith.

2

rot wrote

It allows someone besides the admin and the accused user to voice concerns about a ban. I don't support.

1

celebratedrecluse OP wrote

Cant they write something thoughtful, instead of use quantitative, aggregated, binary yes/no responses to express their opinion?

2