Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments


ConfettiEggnog wrote

" But no one would be able to force rules."

That's one rule already. Soon there will be more. And than a committee just to organize the independents.

"Having no property means you cannot deprive someone from a resource."

In short: dying of hunger, cold, and most treatable diseases.


NEOalquimista wrote

When I say "no one would be able to force rules", it means that no one would obey a rule if someone tried to implement it. We obey rules because we need the rulers to provide things. Become independent and no one can rule you. There would be no reason to cooperate. One individual wouldn't be able to bring fascism if everyone is independent.

About the second part, if no one owns anything, everything is available.


ConfettiEggnog wrote

It reminds me of the peasant revolts of the 18th and 19th century Europe. A bunch of guys raping and pillaging "because". Scary shit. Are you sure mob rule is better?