Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

ziq wrote (edited )

Reply to comment by FULLCOMMUNIST in Marxism-Leninism by arduinna

you're so deeply lodged up your own shitpipe you can't even tell when you're being mocked

2

FULLCOMMUNIST wrote

Um, not really? It sure says a lot about anarchists when criticisms of their dismissal of Marxist importance in the global south and decolonization is seen as "mockery", read a fucking book.

−1

ziq wrote (edited )

your politics are basic as fuck yet somehow you feel superior to me

stop using the global south aka my home to push your authoritarian workerist capitalist bullshit

furthermore, stalinism isn't marxism and you're a liar for pretending it is.

2

FULLCOMMUNIST wrote (edited )

What exactly are your politics? Did you develop them from memes? Lmao, what exactly have you said here with any substance? Because your politics sound like the same cringelord meme bullshit that 16-year-olds who simply refuse to read a book have, the type who develop their politics from quote images and comic strips.

−1

ziq wrote

0

[deleted] wrote

3

ziq wrote (edited )

so I have to praise western collectivist capitalism for giving the global south the industrial nightmare that has led to the wholesale destruction of the earth and the erasure of indigenous cultures all over the world, not to mention the ability of indigenous peoples to survive autonomously without capitalism and what amounts to revised slave labor? my bad...

tankies gonna tank

−1

[deleted] wrote (edited )

0

ziq wrote

why does doublespeak piss me off?

−1

[deleted] wrote

2

ziq wrote (edited )

a) I'm already colonised

b) the ruler tankies in my country continue to assist colonizers to further colonize us

c) tankie states have colonized the fuck out of the world so you're not making the point you think you're making

1

arduinna OP wrote

I dunno, why don't we ask the Ukrainians or the Uyghurs

0

[deleted] wrote

0

arduinna OP wrote

What is, then? Are 'reeducation camps' for millions not sufficiently suppressive?

0

[deleted] wrote

0

arduinna OP wrote

That's a point, but I don't see the major difference in what it actually means for the people.

0

FULLCOMMUNIST wrote (edited )

For real, there was nothing remotely "sarcastic" about your original comment, but come on now, we're arguing with an anarchist lmao. I love how your comment got the most upvotes too, are anarchists just politically illiterate and don't even know what their own politics are? Or is this thread actually full of ML lurkers? Lmaoooo.

−1

[deleted] wrote

0

FULLCOMMUNIST wrote

Okay, that's fine I guess, at least you're not pushing that anti-civ an-prim nonsense that the rest of this site seems to love so much.

1

ziq wrote

awesome critique there, mate. I'm humbled by your political astuteness. If only us poor simple peasants could understand that only mega-industrial state capitalism will save us from your imperialism.

2

ziq wrote

You sure crack yourself up a lot, kid.

0

FULLCOMMUNIST wrote

Dude they literally just said they're not being sarcastic or ironic, and that you DO sound white as hell, what are you still going on about?

0

ziq wrote (edited )

Yes, talking about indigenous concerns and the destruction wrought on us by western civilization is 'white as hell.'

you somehow finding a fellow tankie in a sea of anarchists is nothing to gloat about. who gives a shit about buzz's opinion?

your western imperialist collectivist-capitalist machinations are completely transparent to anyone with a morsel of self awareness.

btw the only people I've ever seen use the word 'dude' were all white USAmericans, so you can drop the act.

0