Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

365degrees OP wrote

Reply to comment by GrimWillow in isn't ______ just ______? by 365degrees

Maybe you should learn what shit will happen if you stupid primmies get your way.

−2

GrimWillow wrote

Considering how much ignorance you have in terms of understanding the philosophy of Green Anarchists, your reply is worthless.

4

ziq wrote

stupid primmies

Y transhumanist so ableist?

−1

365degrees OP wrote

deciding the death of like a billion people is good praxis

what's wrong with that????????

stupid

now that's ableist

0

[deleted] wrote

4

365degrees OP wrote

That's hardly a reliable source. The only thing I could trust an anprim to do is sugarcoat the bullshittery they're going to get everyone in.

−2

[deleted] wrote

4

____deleted____ wrote

i mean personally i wouldnt waste time reading an ideology id immediately dismiss

i havent read mein kampf but im not a fan of hitler; reading someones own books about the ideology is generally a waste of time unless you already have some interest in it

0

[deleted] wrote (edited )

2

____deleted____ wrote

oh yeah ive put basic reading into most things but if you tell me to read the book of, say, Lenin, ill tell you to eat my ass because ill never take leninism into consideration

at least reading the fuckin wikipedia page is important but reading entire books is a waste of time

1

GrimWillow wrote

While I agree with you about not needing to read everything, I wouldn't condemn the person for it unless they started spreading misinfo about subjects they never read about...while maintaining an obstinate refusal to even acknowledge that it's misinfo when called on their shit by those who have actually read something...

3

ziq wrote (edited )

Who have make this decision? I dont see them?

Correct answer: because transhumanist not anarchist. Transhumanist liberal capitalist, make bad ideology.

1

____deleted____ wrote

jesus christ transhumanists and primmies are both anarchists

they can literally co-exist the point of anarchism is its all decentralized

i can go eat berries in bolivia or get a machine arm in california its not like one of the two has to be universally established

1

ziq wrote (edited )

No that isn't the point of anarchism. The point of anarchism is to burn down hierachies. All hierarchies. Not reinforce them by calling e.g. capitalism anarchist / voluntary / libertarian (ancaps). Or the just as hierarchy-prone example you just used.

Warping anarchism to mean 'my bourgie hobbies' i.e. 'my glorious privilege' will be the death knell to anarchism.

1

ziq wrote (edited )

Case in point: bitcoin is decentralized. And all it's done is allow the rich to buy lots of bitcoin and have yet another way to hoard their wealth and destroy the planet by burning fossil fuels.

Guess who came up with bitcoin? Ancaps. Can't wait to see what transhumanists come up with.

1

ziq wrote

But me stupid primmie. You wise master of keyboard.

0