Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

ziq wrote

Left unity in action

11

OdiousOutlaw wrote

On a more important note; body builders rarely, if ever, use kettle-bells; body builders lift for form/aesthetic and kettlebells don't break the triple digits in terms of weight (using pounds here), making them inefficient for long term gains.

They also starve and dehydrate themselves to emphasize muscularity and/or have a very restrictive diet; so, in a way, they aren't really as strong they could be; but strength isn't their primary goal.

Powerlifters lift for strength, but don't use kettlebells either; they primarily deadlift, benchpress, and do (weighted) squats, but these exercises have bodyweight counterparts that one needs no weight equipment for, leading to the next thing.

And then there's just plain strength training; where someone uses physical exercise to build muscle; you can use equipment or go weightless and focus on calisthenics, isometrics, and/or plyometrics. Kettlebells are included here; and they're inexpensive, though I'd personally recommend dumbells as they're more versatile.

NOT decadent individualism like body builders / anti civs.

Body builders aren't even the individualist strawmen you're painting them as; disregarding proper gym etiquette is frown upon and they freely share information for improving gains with each other. Look up the concept of "spotter".

10

mr_wrong wrote (edited )

apparently one major point is viewing eden's apples as gods' fuel to know who has to get killed and who not and humans can't have that.

TL;DR: kinda, but not really.

Having read the book, I can confirm this comes up, but is different in context. Without getting too into it, one character is trying to use the apples of eden as a metaphor for 'which animals in the ecosystem should live and which should die'. This is all used for one character to explain anti-civ thought to another.

Borders human parasitism theory, I assume.

In context, it's more-so one character trying to define the culture of civ to a person with zero anti-civ knowledge via popular religious allegory. Basically the whole book is a socratic dialogue of a gorilla trying to teach a liberal anti-civ thought.

it's religious?

Not necessarily, but talks about religion and uses it's themes a lot.

6

MarxistKropotkinistVaush wrote

Tanned able-bodied body builder Adonis who hates civilization and loves fascism is presented as the ideal while weak pale sickly long haired femboys who value civilization and communism are presented as undesirable.

−3

kin OP wrote

Your criticism is coming from bad faith or trolling (maybe you are a Vaush Stan teen idk).

Besides the obvious inventions about the interpretation of the meme when you tried to came up with the false correlation of anticiv and fascism/individualism, I can say that this kind of meme is problematic at some degree as they evoke the same Chad against Incel dichotomy.

But anyways, you are just a troll in the best case, so be rested, more meme dumps are coming

4

Fool wrote

Like I said, you're creating the conceptions yourself, and none of that is ableist.

Are you being ableist by saying that the lifestylist couldn't have a disability? They have something around their face, are they a burn victim?

8

kin OP wrote

I'm not racist, I literally date black women

Lol, how long until you play this fallacious whitey argument

people who refuse to work

We refuse to work for your Civilization, but do you think we spend the day smokin and taking drugs having sex and eating fruit from the tree? (Well we might do that too , but it's besides my point)

7

OdiousOutlaw wrote

Wooooow, so just because in this instance a man of color is presented as more desirable than white men, there's gotta be something wrong with it, huh?

Ngl, your transparent white fragility is disgusting.

My mans is out here living his best life, chilling in the park while the two inconsiderate fucks in the back refuse to social distance or wear masks.

See, I can play this game, too, but better.

10

Fool wrote

Virgin vs Chad states the dichotomy explicitly.

For this you're just seeing your own preconceptions creating the oppressive dichotomy.

4

OdiousOutlaw wrote

Thanks to vehicular transport, they'll have the means to get him some medicine, I guess. Eventually. After he pays for it, of course.

I mean, that transport's the cause for why it's there, but democracy called for trains and who am I to say no, some kind of anarchist?

4