Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

AnarchoDoom wrote (edited )

Reply to comment by syllaby in A simple reproducible action by Ant

First paragraph: bad point here. I'm only reusing these words to point to the language practices I'm referring to. Was Stirner not talking about "the State", or "property" or "God" just because they're spooks?

So about "queer", unlike the other attached categories, this always been to me a non-category. Tho it is indeed culturally-charged, but more of a question mark than anything else. I guess it is, too, some ghost... Like anything impersonal one can identify with, that has little ground in their personal living experience.

We connect to these ghosts either through some conformity (trendiness, herd mentality) patterns, or just because we personally identify with these, as they feel or look or maybe even are empowering to ourselves, or beneficial in some way.

So I connect to "queer" in the way that I really, really don't fucking relate to the "adult men" representation that society is producing, which is the one I'm finding everywhere around, regardless of their sexual preferences, and goes way beyond their bland clothing and ugly hair styles. Machism, especially, is a morality of domination and rape.

I'm still not getting all this jabs about "purity". I may be looking like I'm expecting this from others here, but that's not the case. I only despise tendencies that reaffirm the normie cultures in all their forms.

Anyways thanks for being explicit in you views and sorry if I read like moralist or whatever.

1