Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

ziq wrote

I didn't defend any small business. I said loot and burn down whatever you want. Stop fucking pinging me.

2

n_n OP wrote (edited )

You said that I wanted banned them because I think "that they are some kind of monster" because they support the self employees in response to when I asked you if do you think that the petite bourgeoisie employers are self employers. And THEN you said that you were fine if they are being robbed. You mocked me with that. That's just being an asshole piece of shit. u/Ziq

I'm done with your fucking lies, I will wait for other admin to intervene.

−3

ziq wrote

like I've told you countless times now, you're completely misunderstanding common words because english isn't your first language and then attacking people based on those misunderstandings

mom and pop stores and self employment are the same thing. they're both business ventures. they're both small-scale capitalism.

most mom and pop stores are run by a single family, thus 'mom and pop'. the mom and pop are self-employed

i never mocked you. you wanted me to get involved and I gave you my opinion. I told them not to use the word hysterical. i told you that was all the action I was going to take. but you keep demanding I do more.

stop stalking me on reddit, my time is my time and you don't own me

stop with the maoist struggle sessions, I told you all I'm not putting up with it any more. I've given you more than enough of my free labor only for you to call me a piece of shit in return

if it were up to me you would already be banned for this constant harassment

2

n_n OP wrote (edited )

mom and pop stores and self employment are the same thing. they're both business ventures. they're both small-scale capitalism.

Self employed don't have employees! In the link that you showed me it doesn't talk about "mom and pop" business. "Mom and pop" means that they are family owned but doesn't necessary mean that they don't have employees. As I said, the link that I showed you says that mom and pop stores have a minimum amount of employees, means at least one. Self employed are not fucking capitalist. I know how to read. I specifically talked about the employers, those who have fewer than 20 employees in fact that are the majority among the small business employers. So what you are saying as the other user are unfounded opinions, you are smearing the self employed as fucking capitalists. Anarchist bookfaits are small capitalists? pff fuck you.

Edit a word.

stop stalking me on reddit, my time is my time and you don't own me

You are posting what are you doing in reddit here, I'm not stalking you. You are boasting your discussions with the nerds in Reddit. And you can take their insults and their struggle session with no problem what so ever. So how is it? Here you cry about being abused and that you don't have mental strength to keep going with the "struggle sessions". then you go to Reddit to keep insulted in that circle jerk?

Here we are not having a "struggle session", there is only me and you here. This is the place in which Raddle decided that conflicts should be resolve, so we gonna solve this conflict here.

−4

ziq wrote

minimum in that context does not mean at least one, it can mean zero, or it can mean their children or other relatives work at the store

self employed people can hire employees

mom and pop stores can have employees, as can self employed people because they're one and the same.

self employed people who operate a business are still capitalists whether they have employees or not, as they still control capital. capitalist does not mean 'has employees', it means 'has capital'.

a hairdresser who operates a single shop is both self employed and is a mom and pop store, and if they later hire an employee as they accumulate more capital, they remain self-employed and a mom and pop store.

for-profit anarchist bookshops are capitalist enterprises whether you like it or not.

I'm done here. i never cared about this boring fucking argument you pulled me into. leave me alone.

1

n_n OP wrote

You have you view and I have mine. At least that point has been clarified, that's something positive I guess. I won't going to bother you any more. I don't have more to say so the discussion can be closed.

−3

n_n OP wrote (edited )

minimum in that context does not mean at least one

How do you know?

Self-employment is the state of working for oneself rather than an employer. An employer is a person or organization that employs people. The US census differentiates the employers and non-employers in two groups. I cited the employers business owners. I'm also not talking about co-ops, who are owned and self-managed by its workers. Seriously, stop conflating working people with capitalists, it's disgusting. If you are done the so I am.

−3