Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

blog wrote (edited )

The thread is available in my post history, but keep downvoting me before you know anything in specific about what I'm talking about, definitely don't try to get facts before forming an opinion, that's against the TOS

6

boom wrote (edited )

I'm not reading your whole post history to find it. Did you even report the ableism to the admins?

And I didn't downvote you..

−3

blog wrote (edited )

They saw it and did nothing. There was a whole thread about it in /f/meta which was since deleted. Keep casting ignorant aspersions. My post history is super short and if your default assumption is just that I'm lying because I Said A Bad Thing About Raddle then I'm not gonna argue with you.

EDIT Oh I think they "warned" the user but that's how it works here, if you're a part of the favored in-crowd you can do anything you want and be given infinite second chances, if you're not, fuck up once and you're banned

7

boom wrote (edited )

Looking at your post history, you seem to be some kind of tankie so I'm not surprised you're attacking me and calling me a liar for asking for more information. Fuck you.

−4

blog wrote (edited )

I criticized one group of anarchists 100 years ago. This is literally not what it means to be a tankie. If "criticizing any anarchists anywhere ever" is what being a tankie is then a lot of anarchists are tankies. This is ridiculous.

I also literally never called you a liar. You can literallly go and try and quotemine me and you'll fail because I literally never said it. Specifically what I accused you of was jumping to conclusions and being unwilling to hear bad things about something you like (this website).

Being dissatisfied with favoritist moderation and double standards is literally not what it means to be tankie.

6

boom wrote (edited )

Edit: you edited it, so I can't quote what you said

−4

blog wrote (edited )

I literally said in that quote that you made an assumption. I also never defended a state, you are misreading me.

EDIT sometimes when someone is being ridiculous I do get angry and say shit wrong. So then I have to go back and edit. I don't actually recall what I originally said but the reason why I edited it is I don't really stand by it and/or it wasn't what I really wanted to say.

But what I've been trying to say is that you're jumping to conclusions, not accusing you of lying.

6

boom wrote

When you say raddle doesn't include aces as queer, do you mean cishet aces?

−4

blog wrote

That is also not what I said and explaining and re-explaining myself to you again and again is boring

6

boom wrote

I didn't say you said it.

Are you a cishet ace?

−4

blog wrote (edited )

No, I am neither cis, straight, nor ace. I already addressed that I'm not ace at all in the other thread you supposedly read. Keep casting ignorant aspersions.

EDIT heads up I edited for clarity

EDIT you did literally say that I said that

EDIT for the record I'm pan and nb.

5