Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

n_n wrote (edited )

In my opinion, I don't think that Ace exclusion as a whole is against the ToS. Asexual and queer are sexual minorities that have intersection tho. Queer is an umbrella term for sexual and gender minorities who are not heterosexual or are not cisgender. Assexual is also an umbrella term, heteroromantic ace is part of it and can't be considered queer. Biromantic, homoromantic and panromantic ace people are queer, and should be allowed in queer spaces. Aromantic ace is a grey area, some considered queer others not, and I'm not informed enough to give an opinion on that. So in short the whole term can't be included under the queer umbrella and, only the queer elements on it can. That's how I see it at the moment. That if we want to be technical. People here talk about that asexual suffer discrimination, but I think that the brunt of that discrimination is toward the queer asexuals, for being queer. You will have to show me reliable sources to convince me that heteromantic people are systematically discriminated. Queer spaces are safe spaces for queer people.

−7